From: "Finn Lassen finn.lassen@verizon.net" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=74.6.134.41; envelope-from=finn.lassen@verizon.net
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Evap cores
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-12932418@logan.com>
Message-ID: <9163e2e3-2026-4d27-38aa-fd866913b37a@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2019 11:08:25 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <list-12932418@logan.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------861D83041FAA8DD8B4EF3979"
Content-Language: en-US

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------861D83041FAA8DD8B4EF3979
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Came across this. Not complete, but might be helpful to someone:


On 9/6/2019 9:16 PM, Finn Lassen finn.lassen@verizon.net wrote:
> Not sure why I was so stuck on only putting evap cores in the cowl 
> cheeks.
>
> Evap cores are cheaply available.
>
> I'm thinking they could easily be stacked under the engine as well. 
> (Not making then 8" thick, but flat end to flat end, or tank-to-tank).
>
> One way would be to join them flat end to flat end with an o-ring. 
> That would put them in series. 13" wide and 18" long.
>
> The other way would be tank against tank, which would enable parallel 
> (but more hoses). 9" wide and 26" long.
>
> I don't remember earlier postings on this, but would 3/4" ID hoses be 
> enough for a series configuration? (200 max HP Renesis, more likely 
> 180 HP)
>
> Finn
>
>
> -- 
> Homepage:?? http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub: 
> http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>


--------------861D83041FAA8DD8B4EF3979
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Came across this. Not complete, but
      might be helpful to someone:<br>
      <img
src="http://sc01.alicdn.com/kf/H401eae956ef046af832df7ac348adb81t/1922633/H401eae956ef046af832df7ac348adb81t.png"
        data-width="718" data-height="1000" style="max-width: 750px;
        width: 718px; height: 1000px;"
        data-spm-anchor-id="a2700.details.pronpeci14.i1.1c286e99K7BFlm"
        width="718" height="1000"><br>
      <br>
      On 9/6/2019 9:16 PM, Finn Lassen <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:finn.lassen@verizon.net">finn.lassen@verizon.net</a> wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:list-12932418@logan.com">Not sure
      why I was so stuck on only putting evap cores in the cowl cheeks.
      <br>
      <br>
      Evap cores are cheaply available.
      <br>
      <br>
      I'm thinking they could easily be stacked under the engine as
      well. (Not making then 8" thick, but flat end to flat end, or
      tank-to-tank).
      <br>
      <br>
      One way would be to join them flat end to flat end with an o-ring.
      That would put them in series. 13" wide and 18" long.
      <br>
      <br>
      The other way would be tank against tank, which would enable
      parallel (but more hoses). 9" wide and 26" long.
      <br>
      <br>
      I don't remember earlier postings on this, but would 3/4" ID hoses
      be enough for a series configuration? (200 max HP Renesis, more
      likely 180 HP)
      <br>
      <br>
      Finn
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      --
      <br>
      Homepage:?? <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.flyrotary.com/">http://www.flyrotary.com/</a>
      <br>
      Archive and UnSub:????
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html">http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html</a>
      <br>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <p><br>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>

--------------861D83041FAA8DD8B4EF3979--