X-Junk-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=L4JfeKb8 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=Q+RT7pemMA8jd7xFDSW77A==:117 a=ARsD2Zh+XVDBxMg1LcsUug==:17 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=VqmtQeTB-p0A:10 a=JBFolyDoGHsA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=XBh2sy_UAAAA:20 a=anPj2h5ADbqKO1PdrCYA:9 a=7Zwj6sZBwVKJAoWSPKxL6X1jA+E=:19 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=ayj8Ue9muBw1X8dZ6QoA:9 a=D6pDFEScmGq7wcEH:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=Urk15JJjZg1Xo0ryW_k8:22 From: "Tracy Crook rwstracy@gmail.com" Received: from mail-pf1-f176.google.com ([209.85.210.176] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2.8) with ESMTPS id 11710269 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 14:07:33 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.210.176; envelope-from=rwstracy@gmail.com Received: by mail-pf1-f176.google.com with SMTP id p12-v6so7572231pfh.2 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 11:07:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:date:subject:message-id :references:in-reply-to:to; bh=nMpE9NJRRON7hK6WIzcIjBQjAfujFsVT0rczx9EtlNg=; b=hB0hUaWS2maZvhiaswEtzGcMnaxPm6Nlx1qs5x7deVERmKxRNYqoCqRm7cTgfA5d8Z pevT2d6eeYHR/X8rIdqFu++HzjvF3pRIDl6+G/lNkyxcjKLlQ0p+FfK/yz4RKAaT6Rzv XUDKjjih4Fn7OABTScDYonskYJ/VEfvBM+5bGL9xEUv+wjhEcGT6EgcJXPsXQzuQuJ3H 4OkmeF0PLK78V/0TcvLXp/cwBdZDqwp+dsf1pRoXEykj+HR0Ona1pZtrxh/4/88ixnJW n805lmyaub2UGbvA2RIdBd11mmlz5tfoYN26loaLzWVbJG46j8BKi8DnPb2HG7fNM56V 20ag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:date :subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to:to; bh=nMpE9NJRRON7hK6WIzcIjBQjAfujFsVT0rczx9EtlNg=; b=qmH1VSR/dlAgxnoIvC2CKebYUlsZJlx8l/g+jjIHq37qa9SBTI3VMpTF+uo/S6QZYl qG17gVJBYtzKtHm5KzSiqJm8QLuOGZDcU48b64/vV7UImphRz+/q+aJm3CmyVYLVdkuX M63Uk/znPOb9VsxJIt8dJSST99NTnK1GYlgjvR229WKrfA2mAtFgDhmUC6x/MHcmEe/Z YvIw8u73vyWtrXrlKAIosSAq6tXFm8AA7otAeqpuuscCGaoWlb7AaXKNpvmwQBHkwTZ4 RfhczcJ5qvMLnKMPcFwqIqlNVvxwhaZyFaQbCIFUKqXFrl/Z751PmUwAZHOHJXsUlE++ rfAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfohvfckz4IrNEVj/bLTfM5t9WAwW7n34j7M2+4FUwaSwe67mrm0v WlwFdDyfKd6LCeMcZbDSpo7xFe8s X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63BAq6X8YNLMRYlx/DVONcxrb7Ik4QOGfnhO8bdzAZgWUP5Wkja6IatcaMP6AdiLhEMfWnZnA== X-Received: by 2002:a62:5882:: with SMTP id m124-v6mr7879975pfb.249.1538330835707; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 11:07:15 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [172.20.10.6] (35.sub-97-43-193.myvzw.com. [97.43.193.35]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o3-v6sm11736201pgv.53.2018.09.30.11.07.05 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 30 Sep 2018 11:07:14 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-FD3D073E-160F-405E-8734-C323E5C6452A Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 11:38:21 -0600 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] 2 pass or not 2 pass... oil cooler? Message-Id: References: In-Reply-To: To: Rotary motors in aircraft X-Mailer: iPad Mail (15G77) --Apple-Mail-FD3D073E-160F-405E-8734-C323E5C6452A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable No elaborate Studies on this, just my observations over the years, so take t= his with a grain of salt. I think the advantages of a double pass cooler are highly over rated. I=E2=80= =99d use which ever worked out best for hose routing. I also think the stoc= k Mazda cooler is underrated. It works much better than its appearance woul= d suggest. Inlets and Ducts are harder to get right than I ever suspected. Pressure re= adings in front and after coolers are invaluable for determining when they a= re working. =20 Outlet ducts from the cooler exit would be great but I=E2=80=99ve never foun= d them to be practical. They required too much compromise with other things= . BUT, I reasoned that the velocity immediately out of the coolers is not t= hat high and is turbulent, so I concentrated on the cowl outlet where the ve= locity IS high. Aim to make it as much like a rocket engine nozzle as possi= ble. I found that shaping the exit into a diffuser improved cooling a bit e= ven though adding the pieces that shaped it reduced the throat area of the '= nozzle'. Avoid sharp turns, corners and edges. Cleaning up the exit duct a= lone got me almost 5 deg F. improvement in cooling on the RV-8. =20 Tracy Crook > On Sep 30, 2018, at 01:55, Todd Bartrim bartrim@gmail.com wrote: >=20 > Hey Rotorheads; > This summer I bought the Fluidyne DB30618 but it is only a single pass.= I recently inquired about them with Summit Racing and they say they will pr= ovide a 2-pass as a custom order. The stock oil cooler is a 2-pass but much m= ore restrictive. The single pass added a longer hose with a 180 swept fittin= g to make it work. > I'm seeing higher temps than I'd like to despite my improved duct work.= Actually inlet duct was improved, but outlet duct is new as I didn't have o= ne before and I do wonder if the outlet duct is restrictive but I'm limited w= ith space and old nose gear mount being in the way (as much as I'd like to r= emove the nose wheel mount it is integral to the engine mount, so I'm stuck w= ith it), so I wonder if it would be better to remove the exit duct completel= y and just leave the oil cooler exit air un-ducted? > But to the main question for tonight, I'm thinking about converting my c= ooler to a 2-pass. I have been experiencing higher oil temps than expected a= t around 110C and considering the OAT has dropped considerably, I would like= to reduce these somewhat. I suspect that the flow is not going through the e= ntire cooler evenly with a majority of flow channeling through only a few of= the tubes as it is not really any different than the temps it used to see w= ith the Mazda cooler. The larger size and more efficient design should produ= ce better cooling if oil was flowing evenly through all tubes and spending a= longer time in the cooler. > So I'm thinking it should be simple enough to convert to a 2-pass cooler= which should ensure a better distribution of flow through all the tubes. Bu= t is it really so simple?? See pic at > https://photos.app.goo.gl/TrU99jXjftz4X8h37 > It would seem a simple matter to zip-cut a slot where the red line is, sli= de in a baffle plate and weld it up, re-sealing the end tank, drill a hole a= nd weld in the new AN10 fitting and at the other end, zip off the old AN12 f= itting and weld it up. This would also simplify plumbing, as the oil in line= would be shorter and go straight in with no 180 bend. > But the thing is I can only weld on 3 sides of the baffle plate that I w= ould install. I can ensure that it is tightly seated against the tube end pl= ate between the tube but it wouldn't be a sealed junction. Do it right and a= n insignificant amount of oil may bypass there and not go through the tubes.= Do it wrong and it could be a significant amount with a drastic reduction i= n cooling. > Obviously I've already removed the cooler and brought it home with the i= ntent to do this mod, but now I'm second guessing myself. I've considered th= at if Summit Racing is modifying these as a custom order then they likely ar= e doing just what I plan to do. Otherwise it would have to be done during ma= nufacture by Fluidyne. > It seems simple, but I lost sleep last night considering all the variou= s issues. Still didn't do it today, so I figured I'd pose the question to th= e group and go hunting with my kid tomorrow while I wait for the opinions to= arrive. >=20 > On another topic, during a take-off roll the other day, the diaphragm i= n my old stock wastegate actuator blew. I didn't catch it with the throttle u= ntil I hit 16.5 psi of boost. No damage but I gotta say that's a fun way to g= et off the ground in a hurry! I usually limit myself to 6 psi of boost as th= at was the spring pressure. I do have an electronic controller (TurboSmart) w= hich allows me to have higher pressures above the spring pressure, but that i= s intended for high altitude and mountain flying.=20 > I've ordered a new adjustable piston type of actuator that comes with a s= election of 6 springs. I intend to use the 3 psi spring as I usually use the= boost very conservatively and the TurboSmart controller can give me more if= I need it for short mountain strips. > Anyways, I look forward to your opinions on the oil cooler. >=20 > Todd Bartrim ....... 20.6 hours on new RV9 version 2.0..... I had to= cash in beer cans for gas money.... > C-FSTB > RV9 13Bturbo --Apple-Mail-FD3D073E-160F-405E-8734-C323E5C6452A Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable No elaborate Studies on this, just my obser= vations over the years, so take this with a grain of salt.
I think the a= dvantages of a double pass cooler are highly over rated.  I=E2=80=99d u= se which ever worked out best for hose routing.  I also think the stock= Mazda cooler is underrated.  It works much better than its appearance w= ould suggest.

Inlets and Ducts are harder to get ri= ght than I ever suspected.  Pressure readings in front and after cooler= s are invaluable for determining when they are working.  
Outlet ducts from the cooler exit would be great but I=E2=80=99v= e never found them to be practical.  They required too much compromise w= ith other things.  BUT, I reasoned that the velocity immediately out of= the coolers is not that high and is turbulent, so I concentrated on the cow= l outlet where the velocity IS high.  Aim to make it as much like a roc= ket engine nozzle as possible.  I found that shaping the exit into a di= ffuser improved cooling a bit even though adding the pieces that shaped it r= educed the throat area of the 'nozzle'.   Avoid sharp turns, corners an= d edges.  Cleaning up the exit duct alone got me almost 5 deg F. improv= ement in cooling on the RV-8.  

Tracy Crook

On Sep 30, 2018, at 01:55, Todd Bartrim bartrim@gmail.com <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote:

Hey Rotorhe= ads;
   This summer I bought the Fluidyne DB30618 but it= is only a single pass. I recently inquired about them with Summit Racing an= d they say they will provide a 2-pass as a custom order. The stock oil coole= r is a 2-pass but much more restrictive. The single pass added a longer hose= with a 180 swept fitting to make it work.
   I'm seeing= higher temps than I'd like to despite my improved duct work. Actually inlet= duct was improved, but outlet duct is new as I didn't have one before and I= do wonder if the outlet duct is restrictive but I'm limited with space and o= ld nose gear mount being in the way (as much as I'd like to remove the nose w= heel mount it is integral to the engine mount, so I'm stuck with it), so I w= onder if it would be better to remove the exit duct completely and just leav= e the oil cooler exit air un-ducted?
   But to the main q= uestion for tonight, I'm thinking about converting my cooler to a 2-pass. I h= ave been experiencing higher oil temps than expected at around 110C and cons= idering the OAT has dropped considerably, I would like to reduce these somew= hat. I suspect that the flow is not going through the entire cooler evenly w= ith a majority of flow channeling through only a few of the tubes as it is n= ot really any different than the temps it used to see with the Mazda cooler.= The larger size and more efficient design should produce better cooling if o= il was flowing evenly through all tubes and spending a longer time in the co= oler.
  So I'm thinking it should be simple enough to convert= to a 2-pass cooler which should ensure a better distribution of flow throug= h all the tubes. But is it really so simple?? See pic at
It would seem a simple matter to zip-cut a s= lot where the red line is, slide in a baffle plate and weld it up, re-sealin= g the end tank, drill a hole and weld in the new AN10 fitting and at the oth= er end, zip off the old AN12 fitting and weld it up. This would also simplif= y plumbing, as the oil in line would be shorter and go straight in with no 1= 80 bend.
   But the thing is I can only weld on 3 sides o= f the baffle plate that I would install. I can ensure that it is tightly sea= ted against the tube end plate between the tube but it wouldn't be a sealed j= unction. Do it right and an insignificant amount of oil may bypass there and= not go through the tubes. Do it wrong and it could be a significant amount w= ith a drastic reduction in cooling.
   Obviously I've al= ready removed the cooler and brought it home with the intent to do this mod,= but now I'm second guessing myself. I've considered that if Summit Racing i= s modifying these as a custom order then they likely are doing just what I p= lan to do. Otherwise it would have to be done during manufacture by Fluidyne= .
   It seems simple, but I lost sleep last night consid= ering all the various issues. Still didn't do it today, so I figured I'd pos= e the question to the group and go hunting with my kid tomorrow while I wait= for the opinions to arrive.

   On anothe= r topic, during a take-off roll the other day, the diaphragm in my old stock= wastegate actuator blew. I didn't catch it with the throttle until I hit 16= .5 psi of boost. No damage but I gotta say that's a fun way to get off the g= round in a hurry! I usually limit myself to 6 psi of boost as that was the s= pring pressure. I do have an electronic controller (TurboSmart) which allows= me to have higher pressures above the spring pressure, but that is intended= for high altitude and mountain flying. 
  I've ordered a= new adjustable piston type of actuator that comes with a selection of 6 spr= ings. I intend to use the 3 psi spring as I usually use the boost very conse= rvatively and the TurboSmart controller can give me more if I need it for sh= ort mountain strips.
Anyways, I look forward to your opinions on t= he oil cooler.

Todd Bartrim     .......  20.6 h= ours on new RV9 version 2.0.....  I had to cash in beer cans for gas mo= ney....
C-FSTB
RV9 13Bturbo
= --Apple-Mail-FD3D073E-160F-405E-8734-C323E5C6452A--