X-Junk-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=aM2ykv1m c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=OoaFXe+g/VdhdOs1JzoF+Q==:117 a=KwPsGajWcAwA:10 a=KeKAF7QvOSUA:10 a=GSeUNYQKAAAA:8 a=T2t_LeyrJqDXBMZdtikA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=338E37OmUEylZEuMl6oA:9 a=RVBrrAUzp5xmWkifbAlc:22 From: "Andrew Martin" Received: from mail-qt0-f181.google.com ([209.85.216.181] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2c3) with ESMTPS id 10034060 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 20:52:18 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.216.181; envelope-from=andrew@martinag.com.au Received: by mail-qt0-f181.google.com with SMTP id d15so20100723qta.0 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:52:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=martinag-com-au.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=EZgb+LX8z5mQMtwOlJjMWs+jIFu0qEFMsj+KQ8/gnos=; b=mflPwGyLhMYyLmzhw+xfvEsJGFrkKx6k6rzpX5Grmj5CJbG3/LypV/WuO47Y7ix2jO TpdesWQCYo5bNBL5YWsd2n6QIHerR471gZtHFJZ4ey9qmNoId0kwcES8lVS9jqmmPEDO Y0IqmAnAmmV6YErIAlIZeIKAV9Mt5ryxsCsrdzQxB7qETO8o7TWTWQxb8iyqpSjKBH6O qHy4PO5/fi4I4c0RWr7jdhMcci3lR/6mM5NFWizr9KSGi3dY+3JsrALysLdnB3sXGRLz zQxBJu0st+myqwzZZN0MUtF2wXQGc21Cd8xpDoH1DC8TNEKCkFsE8vF8vfXc6o6TMFIi 9J0A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=EZgb+LX8z5mQMtwOlJjMWs+jIFu0qEFMsj+KQ8/gnos=; b=T+3iN5q7gLFeokRBiZ3XI4TK66DY8mVMfzSTrP0A0mrFjsyS7PLCBtIeo32h3N4TLe 2xoGCrCL80abbzRk87XOyRF/eGa+U+Q3exkeSKa1a7Pc+yte/BfYnMR0Tgs56ehLRNg4 rNBQHliDd48aHYsJ1t57frZ34N6TmWAVcZazC0IBkCbUoBZkBZrFUoOpOxyma4V1ekJX O2NBIzHuEiZNiHO1vm9ljFw5bV8ANBTNuwlDBALytQ7hljTLvfkNtcm/+A7o9f6ckUBG 3yHRd4YdGsgUIcoBKRFpVeQrN7s+wRsstZlX0F5z+gb8HsA1kB4Fhw76wJDwz3Ok+wMC /4Bg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5ibuh25mH2Cm7MC6/VQYFtJOdefBP1eR12SUEHSNBehVoyuZU5x Q3AgH77+bNNU7YG0NhZfDOvpO71Q1kHsun0= X-Received: by 10.200.45.168 with SMTP id p37mr10451569qta.151.1503363121333; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:52:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.174.53 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:51:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [202.40.0.40] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 08:51:20 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: oil flow To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c031ead0e6bd05574d00e1" --001a11c031ead0e6bd05574d00e1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sometimes I miss the obvious. Used the Gates flow calculator and realised I had introduced an unnecessary pressure loss to my oil circuit. Before I get ridiculed, here is context. I live 500km from the most remote city on earth. So quite often have to be resourceful with what's on hand or wait forever for part deliveries. During the build I had just grabbed some new hose & fittings from my farm workshop to hook up the oil cooler to the engine, had every intention at the time to replace with lightweight hose & fittings but over the build time just plain forgot. Thought I had the size right but didn't count on so much loss with such low oil operating pressures & flow. but still should've tagged those parts. So before I order a new cooler, I'll try it with larger hose. If I've used it correctly, I reckon I can maybe accept some pressure loss through the cooler if I absolutely minimise it in the hose & fittings. Andrew --001a11c031ead0e6bd05574d00e1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sometimes I miss the obvious. Used = the Gates flow calculator= and realised I had introduced an unnecessary pressure loss to=20 my oil circuit.
Before I get ridiculed, here is=20 context. I live 500km from the most remote city on earth. So quite often have to be resourceful with what's on hand or wait forever for part=20 deliveries. During the build I had just grabbed some new hose &=20 fittings from my farm workshop to hook up the oil cooler to the engine,=20 had every intention at the time to replace with lightweight hose &=20 fittings but over the build time just plain forgot. Thought I had the size = right but didn't count on so much loss with such low oil operating pres= sures & flow. but still should've tagged=20 those parts. So before I order a new cooler, I'll try it with larger ho= se.
If I've used it correctly, I reckon I can maybe accept som= e pressure loss through the cooler if I absolutely minimise it in the hose = & fittings.

=
Andrew
--001a11c031ead0e6bd05574d00e1--