X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com From: "David Leonard" Received: from mail-qt0-f180.google.com ([209.85.216.180] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.14) with ESMTPS id 9391716 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 22:02:46 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.216.180; envelope-from=wdleonard@gmail.com Received: by mail-qt0-f180.google.com with SMTP id k15so78319920qtg.3 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 19:02:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=BDhm291KJDtlQNtZaqBSg6l+ZLdrr+p1sNaPRB8a3Os=; b=MB8fYKlXbR1xdUz8ddR5LPuNozGMOyx4O/3rSHtCgTT2hfkdc3R6954stj7aStM+zP xCuthiq0ie05Yiah8N6zn9Uclj5XtHK2QkwQWT3Zaza1+14WE9ef+g/1fFD3kwPkYjoR cHbKB2R2mGDsRC6oMh9mPrIr5Da6QGzaNEtozcOfqUMbifG60FLTZ/LoY7dVqnUK3V71 aDmKVt35n+yeEfcsP8GvtBrExrWSC7943hoWb/qGt7u6nO+VwdtGzf5lMjPTJSE6r3Fo pssBk38FKEahfKbJAOsBCBiCnUkeyWmn3UXGWW1ZpgBCZTypxoWsTEp0yAurppF6Yh7e Fs5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=BDhm291KJDtlQNtZaqBSg6l+ZLdrr+p1sNaPRB8a3Os=; b=LuWV372yxgMfpQNVJarjRXQW47qwZlGSsGRXsKbs2y5RLcYGzE8tisFZPlKNdAjoae KyjMOFEFapNBq8gcbbMyuB1Ec3A1CLr1m7xvLcPx82Tro6ODScqACr39bD7FW9LZCD1q DUrbO3Y6H6X7FfGc1it3F6eyNupbGfBBXDKa2gIWZomYnC6dtLomjRlJAg/huBCfSyl2 su9vP/Eo68mixstH4CYnuplCsBUsKvWCgcxptiGxKck5MMm1BZ2pjAiOhS+lSJGzszBM E7CflpzpHdqQzW8+KHOEdaRhRcG+tjA8Mh1IOr3I4VPlmBp0L7GwO+QOVn/chfl0Ygpd +PHw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXK1yqC/Zt9y1hZ4WpFAXbVkqolJI1lxIdJE86Debz666pM/aJt8bPy9sKk3A3S6zU1kcXPwZaWKbZjqSQ== X-Received: by 10.237.34.250 with SMTP id q55mr19579310qtc.127.1485054149387; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 19:02:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.55.67.75 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 19:02:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 19:02:28 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2 Stupid Question To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 John, More important than the compressor is the turbine section. If you just upgrade the compressor it will put even more of a load on the turbine secton (I have burned out 2 of them). There are companies that will replace the turbine section with TO4 as well. If you search the archives I have posted the contact info and pictures of my turbine sections. I think the n/a EC2 only goes up to 30 or 32" or something like that, (also in the archives somewhere). Even the turbo version only goes up to 50" or something like that. If you go above the upper limit I don't think it will run very well. But yes, Mark, turbo normalizing will work very well. Dave Leonard Turbo 13B RV-6 On 1/21/17, John Overman wrote: > No. I am doing the same thing. Originally I was doing it so I wouldn't have > to use a muffler. > Tracy said as long as I didn't use it to try to attain outlandish manifold > pressures, no > changes were necessary. I should say I'm not flying yet. I have been told > by > others that an occasional boost for take off to, say, 35 inches is ok as > well. > I did have a TO4 compressor section added to the stock turbine since the > mazda turbo was so woefully inadequate. > -------------------------------------------- > On Sat, 1/21/17, Mark McClure wrote: > > Subject: [FlyRotary] EC2 Stupid Question > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Date: Saturday, January 21, 2017, 5:02 PM > > When > I originally bought my EC2 (possibly EC3) I had Tracy build > it for naturally aspirated. > If I turbo normalize the engine do I need to > change the controller programming? > Mark > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html >