From: "=?utf-8?b?SmFycmV0dCBKb2huc29u?=" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=69.49.98.126; envelope-from=hjjohnson@sasktel.net
Message-ID: <20160615084738.52y5antao84ccsw4@webmail.sasktel.net>
Reply-to: hjjohnson@sasktel.net
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Mistral
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 08:47:38 -0600
References: <list-8729865@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-8729865@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="=_1wvf71ozab9m"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Webmail 6.0

This message is in MIME format. 

--=_1wvf71ozab9m
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=UTF-8;
	format="flowed"
Content-Description: Plaintext Version of Message
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I've followed the discussion on intake manifolds with some interest. 
I've noted interest in the recent past of producing an aluminum intake 
manifold. That process is on-going, starting w/ the aquisition of 
additional equipment for my shop. I expect that to be inhouse in early 
July after which I expect to start producing some prototype parts etc. 
=C2=A0
It's interesting to see Tracy's manifold and note how different it is 
from both Mistrals unit as well as what most experts in the field feel 
is the best intake length. Is this the manifold that was used in the 
Sun & Fun race a few years back?
=C2=A0
Regards
=C2=A0
Jarrett Johnson

On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:26:53 -0500, Charlie England  wrote:

       On 6/14/2016 9:52 AM, Tom Mann wrote:
> Any Idea as to where one might find this information?
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Charlie England
> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 9:43 AM
> To: Rotary motors in aircraft
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Mistral
>
> It's not that hard to make an intake that will make great power. Look at
> Tracy's setup. Might not be aesthetically beautiful to some eyes, but to
> me, function is beauty. I don't know of any N/A 2 rotor that's as fast
> as his -4, or as efficient at lower speeds. And really simple to make. 
>
> Charlie

Hope Tracy doesn't mind; here's a shot of the Renesis manifold. I
believe that the tubes inside the 'box' were later extended to be near
the opposite wall. IIRC, Tracy said that the tubes are ~11" from the
face of the block to the end of the bellmouth. 

You can see old versions of the RWS website by using the Wayback Machine
& picking a date. 

Charlie

-------------------------

--
Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.ht=
ml


--=_1wvf71ozab9m
Content-Type: multipart/related;
	boundary="=_3150bw0vj0y2";
	start="315xanmuc87e@webmail.sasktel.net"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

This message is in MIME format. 

--=_3150bw0vj0y2
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=UTF-8
Content-Description: HTML Version of Message
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-ID: 315xanmuc87e@webmail.sasktel.net

<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3DUTF-8" da=
ta-hsystem=3D"true"></head>
<body><style>p{margin: 0;padding: 0;}

</style>
<p>I've followed the discussion on intake manifolds with some interest. I'v=
e
noted interest in the recent past of producing an aluminum intake manifold.=
 That
process is on-going, starting w/ the aquisition of additional equipment for=
 my
shop. I expect that to be inhouse in early July after which I expect to sta=
rt
producing some prototype parts etc.</p>
<p>=C2=A0</p>
<p>It's interesting to see Tracy's manifold and note how different it is fr=
om
both Mistrals unit as well as what most experts in the field feel is the be=
st
intake length. Is this the manifold that was used in the Sun &amp; Fun race=
 a
few years back?</p>
<p>=C2=A0</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>=C2=A0</p>
<p>Jarrett Johnson<br><br>On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:26:53 -0500, Charlie Engla=
nd
&lt;flyrotary@lancaironline.net&gt; wrote:</p>
<blockquote style=3D"border-left: 2px solid #000000; padding-right: 0px;
padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px;">On 6/14/2016 9:52 =
AM,
Tom Mann wrote:<br> &gt; Any Idea as to where one might find this
information?<br> &gt;<br> &gt; -----Original Message----- From: Charlie
England<br> &gt; Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 9:43 AM<br> &gt; To: Rotary m=
otors
in aircraft<br> &gt; Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Mistral<br> &gt;<br> &gt; It'=
s not
that hard to make an intake that will make great power. Look at<br> &gt; Tr=
acy's
setup. Might not be aesthetically beautiful to some eyes, but to<br> &gt; m=
e,
function is beauty. I don't know of any N/A 2 rotor that's as fast<br> &gt;=
 as
his -4, or as efficient at lower speeds. And really simple to make.<br> &gt=
;<br>
&gt; Charlie<br><br> Hope Tracy doesn't mind; here's a shot of the Renesis
manifold. I <br> believe that the tubes inside the 'box' were later extende=
d to
be near <br> the opposite wall. IIRC, Tracy said that the tubes are ~11" fr=
om
the <br> face of the block to the end of the bellmouth.<br><br> You can see=
 old
versions of the RWS website by using the Wayback Machine <br> &amp; picking=
 a
date.<br><br> Charlie<br><br><hr>
<br> --<br> Homepage: <a href=3D"http://webmail.sasktel.net/hwebmail/servic=
es/go.php?url=3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.flyrotary.com%2F" target=3D"_blank">http:/=
/www.flyrotary.com/</a><br> Archive and UnSub: <a href=3D"http://webmail.sa=
sktel.net/hwebmail/services/go.php?url=3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fmail.lancaironline.ne=
t%3A81%2Flists%2Fflyrotary%2FList.html" target=3D"_blank">http://mail.lanca=
ironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html</a>
</blockquote>
<p><br><br></p>

</body>
</html>
--=_3150bw0vj0y2--

--=_1wvf71ozab9m--