X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com From: "William Jepson" Received: from mail-vk0-f43.google.com ([209.85.213.43] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.10) with ESMTPS id 8728310 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 02:34:32 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.213.43; envelope-from=wrjjrs@gmail.com Received: by mail-vk0-f43.google.com with SMTP id t129so80725940vka.1 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 23:34:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=ay0yOsaRbBf0MB6bb95BpgSIAlTtXct0Yn/UMTuO9uY=; b=G3lkq5GTQPSLguJ05uXXNRBDGmJFDYYEhPk2bCEkfDsJIRuJOuJND6U8Nr4D4gmjzd f1kbABuEgmfazZ+oNmb1EsSwULzh2frqeqso8J/Fj2hH4O8R0QupFj/FquIIc2R+lusx lgEOX8d582cA4SBGxsaNNqIJkfkxOSB7NtU6GNyvpdVYv6xOIjk3mGbbg2OVX4jkvLnp 6wftieDOMzwKlBhxbDmpWD+wqu5/DbXtebw1DtciAK5C+gW1bJCGzglqh2OlEYx3TEcH MXmZUVr0MPG+zA70y5XkQ8+3dQembSng8KV9I0JfZWkPifKxZJiE9vwuBuECR1UxjldU ueaw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=ay0yOsaRbBf0MB6bb95BpgSIAlTtXct0Yn/UMTuO9uY=; b=C7kI60KrQvnnJ+nC/sX+nIsp4fUxdJ8s02xgHXeYqlr35RQe99wAD0XbH/lp1/i4Eb HLakAgqpdVZS0GMoVCHdhg1FOafm6Nrkq5m6yJrnATG5xNdmpk3xMrIagFOvICndzhL2 8ZxX+tR6QjfYaJJymf1GPl6UebMYVs6KecIaWqDiMeTwJsIRZ9/JeM0HJYqnARCS6G53 tCJfj5QIsjIpQyTW2O6NDS36Oc+lF0CI/FTFPhF+Bl/hkJuMUvVNngdsPpA08Pwpnng2 5ZJOkcrOGApNq6srh+6eOOJT3k79cwfM3mQDw+7KdAknUFEnSU4L31njpAW7kXHVkS2r mEHg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJl1qHNXKFZaikyuxFGu2e5I/P9BdKzQu3sHCJ6d1KAnzMsSXJsGf+DgCTOc/3vGNgyFX/6q6C9q4IcYg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.193.193 with SMTP id r184mr7983993vkf.4.1465886053803; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 23:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.9.69 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 23:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.9.69 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 23:34:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 23:34:13 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Mistral To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114daee484abc305353731d6 --001a114daee484abc305353731d6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Lynn, I'm sure the thing that stopped Mistral was the FAA paper trail requirements. All the parts need to be made in house, or be certified by their manufacturer. Since Mazda had no intention of certifying their parts the start up production cost would be huge. I'm sure the engine would pass the requirements easily, but that isn't enough for the FAA. The added parts cost is ridiculous. A friend has a Grumman American Tiger. It needed a wheel bearing. The aircraft part cost $107. The identical bearing with the same SKF part number RETAILS for $19 bucks, just no paperwork. Mistral should have embraced experimental aircraft. They could have had some sales, instead of a money pit. Bill Jepson On Jun 13, 2016 8:48 PM, "Lehanover" wrote: > The intake was designed to fit the mid 80s style13B intake ports in both 2 > rotor and 3 rotor engines. Runner length tuned to cruise RPM. intake design > well done. Reduction gearbox very well designed with power take off pulleys > and hydraulic propeller governor mount. > > Versions of both engines also ran on jet A. Tried for years to get engines > certified in Europe and US. Probably not possible so as to maintain the > status of current 1920s technology aircraft engines. > I was offered an job with them. I helped all I could via Email. Test Piper > landed short when test muffler decomposed blocking exit flow. Destroyed > Piper. They tune like dirt bikes. Sensitive to exhaust flow and back > pressure. > > Lynn E. Hanover > > In a message dated 6/13/2016 3:00:33 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > flyrotary@lancaironline.net writes: > > www.mistral-engines.com > > --001a114daee484abc305353731d6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Lynn,
I'm sure the thing that stopped Mistral was the FAA paper trail require= ments. All the parts need to be made in house, or be certified by their man= ufacturer. Since Mazda had no intention of certifying their parts the start= up production cost would be huge. I'm sure the engine would pass the r= equirements easily, but that isn't enough for the FAA. The added parts = cost is ridiculous. A friend has a Grumman American Tiger. It needed a whee= l bearing. The aircraft part cost $107. The identical bearing with the same= SKF part number RETAILS for $19 bucks, just no paperwork. Mistral should h= ave embraced experimental aircraft. They could have had some sales, instead= of a money pit.

Bill Jepson

On Jun 13, 2016 8:48 PM, "Lehanover" &= lt;flyrotary@lancaironline.n= et> wrote:
The intake was designed to fit the mid 80s style13B intake ports in bo= th 2=20 rotor and 3 rotor engines. Runner length tuned to cruise RPM. intake design= well=20 done. Reduction gearbox very well designed with power take off pulleys and= =20 hydraulic propeller governor mount.
=C2=A0
Versions of both engines also ran on jet A. Tried for years to get eng= ines=20 certified in Europe and US. Probably not possible so as to maintain the sta= tus=20 of current 1920s technology aircraft engines.
I was offered an job with them. I helped all I could via Email. Test P= iper=20 landed short when test muffler decomposed blocking exit flow. Destroyed Pip= er.=20 They tune like dirt bikes. Sensitive to exhaust flow and back pressure.
=C2=A0
Lynn E. Hanover
=C2=A0
In a message dated 6/13/2016 3:00:33 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,=20 flyrotary@= lancaironline.net writes:
www.mistral-engines.com
=
--001a114daee484abc305353731d6--