X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com From: "William Jepson" Received: from mail-vk0-f48.google.com ([209.85.213.48] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.10) with ESMTPS id 8628181 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 02 May 2016 20:56:40 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.213.48; envelope-from=wrjjrs@gmail.com Received: by mail-vk0-f48.google.com with SMTP id o133so6057347vka.0 for ; Mon, 02 May 2016 17:56:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=7xC2iS0SSuFC1IovWIbt/G/UNNzEMbnbrpBeXoB2/Ds=; b=O/SemMEkwNEQGfybD3wT4PEUuQJz1K4GRgCgL/dNSdS7fBozdZXL5ZmK+JPFqkzSLt VsbuHjmxyEqBvBMW4QLgjAIOIrc+oAPSGD+ibjLVPexFnHSo9g8jyatm9iBrm/zNl367 azkDsqLSdLicPSsv4xEf9wQkOvAtJx5xpjxGuX1kP8HOUrEk0JwPGJf43AnO7NdCL6cC eZx+COivkb/dVJ2ZOzAUctQNcfDNKP50bGXzN6qu3ovJa7ZhdPcx7xPv5Deo1psEZX79 rpZO1XSW0vex2BrLheQI7Xn60low9KfpphHXMOwR0NvxEqtWgpGXV4z2gLkuG8l1rzLI o/+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=7xC2iS0SSuFC1IovWIbt/G/UNNzEMbnbrpBeXoB2/Ds=; b=lBXhpWr4tlLEa6Vk04jhyVffe4VUIpYMSdIuCnRl87LBiotwMQJMzlxgooNxKI7Hfe QUHS0ORyv6Y8Oi8qHTn12Dt5Q1Om8p9YESPktfn3RS1BjC4njwBh6jZ6nfFZP5gAToiW Ut8jI9G7HQ1CEsWWa0HxAyvBCaBenxhKaAfWxBOcV89jLxlQrfxXqpiOR0o6vtiZuOrs XCDiBYUlWclQjk5c8IdpaNfF1Niq0vsvz+EfyjPaYzWqQ9ZkqudWyNM78WbOasmuGKod /yUL22bw96lXQKGi8QFX6Q9b6TUMGGpU/tbnEBLFMrV4WDg1t75MFzhjeOSESFPS/naX BmeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVBJId2T3e2QIveAUSM+LgcSdPEk0w+vkpB+M0DlBiWj5s11NA08SUoefXKBw6l2v6NhkBnc5xppPbd3Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.134.5 with SMTP id i5mr1249793vkd.25.1462236983167; Mon, 02 May 2016 17:56:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.9.69 with HTTP; Mon, 2 May 2016 17:56:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.9.69 with HTTP; Mon, 2 May 2016 17:56:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 17:56:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Quinti props?? To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11441d50f58fe00531e593a1 --001a11441d50f58fe00531e593a1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Can't tell if the stuff I'm seeing on the internet is them or just guys selling their stuff. Bill Jepson On May 2, 2016 4:55 PM, "Charlie England" wrote: > True, but I've got a copy of the manual, and it does mention both SAE type > 1, and SAE type 2, "available for Subaru H6 Eggenfellner rated at 200 HP." > I'd post it, but it's 2+ megs. The early ones did use warp drive blades, > which likely aren't suitable for faster planes like RV-x's. But some, > including one I'm looking at now, has Sensenich blades on the type 2 hub. > If I decide to get serious, I'll contact Sensenich to see if the blades are > RV-suitable. > > Do you know if Quinti is still in business? If they are, they seem to be > in stealth mode, with no web site that Google can find. Any distributors in > the USA? The prop I'm currently looking at has been operating fine for a > number of years (and hours), but I'd prefer not paying for something for > which I'll never be able to get replacement parts. > > Thanks for the help, > > Charlie > > On 5/2/2016 2:06 PM, William Jepson wrote: > > Charlie, > I still see a few resellers for Quinti stuff. Be aware that the hubs I'm > seeing are only rated to 160 HP. A 2 rotor with decent tune should exceed > that easily. A peripheral port by 40 or 50 HP! They were using warp drive > blades when I first saw them, don't know if that is still true. > Bill Jepson > > On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Charlie England < > flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote: > >> There have been several Eggenfelner systems coming off RV's lately, and >> some have Quinti props. The H6 engines appear to have prop hubs that would >> match ours (Tracy's). Unfortunately, the Quinti web site is gone, so I >> assume that the company is gone, too. >> >> Anyone here in the rotaryverse have experience with Quinti electric >> props? Safety record, quality, performance, etc? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Charlie >> > > > --001a11441d50f58fe00531e593a1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Can't tell if the stuff I'm seeing on the internet i= s them or just guys selling their stuff.

Bill Jepson

On May 2, 2016 4:55 PM, "Charlie England&qu= ot; <flyrotary@lancaironl= ine.net> wrote:
=20 =20 =20
True, but I've got a copy of the manual, and it does mention both SAE type 1, and SAE type 2, "available for Subaru H6 Eggenfellner rated at 200 HP." I&#= 39;d post it, but it's 2+ megs. The early ones did use warp drive blades, which likely aren't suitable for faster planes like RV-x's. B= ut some, including one I'm looking at now, has Sensenich blades on the type 2 hub. If I decide to get serious, I'll contact Sensenic= h to see if the blades are RV-suitable.

Do you know if Quinti is still in business? If they are, they seem to be in stealth mode, with no web site that Google can find. Any distributors in the USA? The prop I'm currently looking at has been operating fine for a number of years (and hours), but I'd prefer not paying for something for which I'll never be able to get replacement parts.

Thanks for the help,

Charlie

On 5/2/2016 2:06 PM, William Jepson wrote:
Charlie,
I still see a few resellers for Quinti stuff. Be aware that the hubs I'm seeing are only rated to 160 HP. A 2 rotor with decent tune should exceed that easily. A peripheral port by 40 or 50 HP! They were using warp drive blades when I first saw them, don't know if that is still true.
Bill Jepson=C2=A0

On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Charlie England <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote:
There have been several Eggenfelner systems coming off RV's lately, and some have Quinti props. The H= 6 engines appear to have prop hubs that would match ours (Tracy's). Unfortunately, the Quinti web site is gone, so I assume that the company is gone, too.

Anyone here in the rotaryverse have experience with Quinti electric props? Safety record, quality, performance, etc?

Thanks,

Charlie


--001a11441d50f58fe00531e593a1--