X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com From: "Home" Received: from [149.115.68.13] (HELO mail119c7.megamailservers.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.9) with ESMTPS id 8563114 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 20:47:36 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=149.115.68.13; envelope-from=hjjohnson@sasktel.net X-Authenticated-User: hjjohnson.sasktel.net X-VIP: 69.49.109.87 Received: from [10.83.193.112] ([142.165.45.137]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail119c7.megamailservers.com (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id u3A0lFda018450 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 20:47:17 -0400 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-6053AB14-E890-4383-B0DB-1253D537C110 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Intake Styles and Data Message-Id: <6EC88401-8A7B-4C54-8878-316CE3D84A7D@sasktel.net> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:47:15 -0600 References: In-Reply-To: To: Rotary motors in aircraft X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13E238) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020202.5709A296.0019,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Rules: X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=2.1 cv=OoF2lUPt c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=s2azCmSAyeJvhuhPdCPEQg==:117 a=s2azCmSAyeJvhuhPdCPEQg==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=Q8GDjzZ8-bG-5z4OcOQA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=pwABkc_dq9pVteWXTXYA:9 a=eAr7iMFwBr3KuMRA:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 --Apple-Mail-6053AB14-E890-4383-B0DB-1253D537C110 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sure Kelly. In simple form I think I have got to the point where I can produce highly d= etailed, investment cast parts. And do so for relatively decent cost. I thin= k the rotary is a good candidate for this process. Kelly and I've discussed i= t some offline but at his suggestion I've brought the idea to the list.=20 I think there are other possible uses for this process that would benefit ro= tary installations but for now I thought I'd start w/ intakes. The question i= s what make/years does one shoot for and what porting is most common. I susp= ect there will be two main groups, P-Port and stock. I'm not opposed to deve= loping more than one, although I think a single unit as a starting place is b= est for now. I've a plane project in the works and while I'm a long ways from putting a m= otor on it.. When the time comes it'd be nice to have bolt on solutions for s= everal of these question areas. Thanks guys Jarrett All grammar and spelling errors, compliments of my iPhone > On Apr 9, 2016, at 15:34, Kelly Troyer wrote= : >=20 > Jarrett, >=20 > Tell the group what intake ideas you are kicking around.........Getting= the intake right (putting the power at the rpm you need) for the flying > Rotary engine has always been a hassle........... >=20 > Kelly Troyer >=20 >> On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Jarrett Johnson wrote: >> Guy's I'm curious as to what is being currently used (and planned) for in= takes? Are most guys just building from scratch or buying something that can= be modified? Are many planning to go the P-port route or just staying w/ th= e existing ports and building to suit? >>=20 >> =20 >>=20 >> =20 >>=20 >> Thanks >>=20 >> =20 >>=20 >> Jarrett Johnson >>=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail-6053AB14-E890-4383-B0DB-1253D537C110 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sure Kelly.

 In simple form I th= ink I have got to the point where I can produce highly detailed, investment c= ast parts. And do so for relatively decent cost. I think the rotary is a goo= d candidate for this process. Kelly and I've discussed it some offline but a= t his suggestion I've brought the idea to the list. 

I think there are= other possible uses for this process that would benefit rotary installation= s but for now I thought I'd start w/ intakes. The question is what make/year= s does one shoot for and what porting is most common. I suspect there will b= e two main groups, P-Port and stock. I'm not opposed to developing more than= one, although I think a single unit as a starting place is best for now.

I= 've a plane project in the works and while I'm a long ways from putting a mo= tor on it.. When the time comes it'd be nice to have bolt on solutions for s= everal of these question areas.

Thanks guys
Jarrett

All grammar and spelling errors, compliments of my iPhon= e

On Apr 9, 2016, at 15:34, Kelly Troyer <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote:
=
Jarrett,

<= div>   Tell the group what intake ideas you are kicking around....= .....Getting the intake right (putting the power at the rpm you need) for th= e flying
Rotary engine has always been a hassle...........

Kelly Troyer

On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Jarrett Johnson <flyrotary@lancaironline.net> wrote:

Guy's I'm curious as to what is being currently used (and planned) for intakes? Are most guys just building from scratch or buying something that c= an be modified? Are many planning to go the P-port route or just staying w/ the= existing ports and building to suit?

 

 

Thanks

 

Jarrett Johnson

 





= --Apple-Mail-6053AB14-E890-4383-B0DB-1253D537C110--