X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from aphrodite.gwi.net ([207.5.128.164] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with ESMTPS id 6510053 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:22:29 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.5.128.164; envelope-from=silvius@gwi.net Received: from yourlk4rlmsu41 (bb-66-63-125-233.gwi.net [66.63.125.233]) by aphrodite.gwi.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id r9AGLrv6088879 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:21:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from silvius@gwi.net) Message-ID: <007801cec5dc$c0eb82e0$0202a8c0@yourlk4rlmsu41> From: "Michael Silvius" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: waterless coolant? Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:18:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0075_01CEC5B2.D55FD0C0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3664 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3664 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0075_01CEC5B2.D55FD0C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable While on the subject of cooling, I am curious if anyone has tried the = waterless coolant? Seems to offer some advantages, namely higher boiling = boint and low pressure, is there any reason it should not be used in our = aplication? http://www.evanscooling.com/ Michael ------=_NextPart_000_0075_01CEC5B2.D55FD0C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
While on the subject = of cooling, I=20 am curious if anyone has tried the waterless coolant? Seems to = offer=20 some advantages, namely higher boiling boint and low pressure, is = there any=20 reason it should not be used = in our aplication?
http://www.evanscooling.com/
 
Michael
------=_NextPart_000_0075_01CEC5B2.D55FD0C0--