Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #60262
From: Tracy <rwstracy@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Prop and PSRU efficiency
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 17:48:53 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Wikipedia is generally a pretty good source for info.   They put planetary losses at around 3%.  That sounds about right to me.   A simple spur or helical gear set is around 2% loss and I would expect the planetary to be a bit higher due to the higher number of gears in mesh.

Tracy

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 7, 2013, at 17:42, "Bill Bradburry" <bbradburry@bellsouth.net> wrote:

Based on the below statement, where would Tracy’s planet gear system fall?

 

PSRUs have losses inherent in their gearsets or belts. Lay people have often speculated that these losses are up to 40 hp in the case of a 200 hp class drive. This is absurd as it would represent about 30,000 watts being dissipated as heat. If this was in fact true, the case or belts would melt in just a few minutes. Typical losses for single mesh spur and helical gears is around 2-2.5%. HTD belts run at 3-4%. Twin mesh helical gearsets would then have perhaps a 6% loss as worst case including bearing losses.

The statement came from:

 

http://www.sdsefi.com/air51.htm

 

B2

 


From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill Bradburry
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 3:42 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Prop and PSRU efficiency

 

Mark,

 

They would be included if the engine was tested on a dyno, so I consider them to be part of the engine.  But not so the PSRU if measuring from the flywheel.

 

Ernest,

 

I don’t know what you mean by .98 to .99??  Certainly you don’t think it would only be a loss of 1 or 2%!??  It would have to be in the range of 10 to 20 HP or even greater.  That is 5 to 10% in our HP range.  Just the loss due to prop efficiency is in the range of 30 HP!

 

Bill

 


From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Mark Steitle
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 1:26 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Prop and PSRU efficiency

 

Bill,

 

While you're at it don't forget to account for the water pump and alternator(s).

 

Mark S.

 

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Bill Bradburry <bbradburry@bellsouth.net> wrote:

I have asked this question a couple of times and no one has hazarded a
guess.

How much HP is lost from our engines due to the PSRU?  I have been
interested in determining what the HP output of my engine is and that info
would be needed for that estimation.

They tell me that most props are about 80-85% efficient, so to calculate the
hp, you take the difference between your climb rate and your glide descent
rate at the same airspeed, multiplied by the weight, and then divided by
33000.

Wt * V / 33000 = HP

This would be the prop HP, so to get the prop flange HP, you would divide by
the prop efficiency, between .8 and .85.

To get the engine flywheel HP, you would have to add something for the loss
of the PSRU.

Is anyone willing to take a shot at that number??  Third or forth chance!
:>)

Bill B




--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html

 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster