flyrotary@lancaironline.net Mailing List Archive

Mark,

They would be included if the engine was tested on a dyno, so I consider them to be part of the engine. But not so the PSRU if measuring from the flywheel.

Ernest,

I don’t know what you mean by .98 to .99?? Certainly you don’t think it would only be a loss of 1 or 2%!?? It would have to be in the range of 10 to 20 HP or even greater. That is 5 to 10% in our HP range. Just the loss due to prop efficiency is in the range of 30 HP!

Bill

From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Mark Steitle
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 1:26 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Prop and PSRU efficiency

Bill,

While you're at it don't forget to account for the water pump and alternator(s).

Mark S.

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Bill Bradburry <bbradburry@bellsouth.net> wrote:

I have asked this question a couple of times and no one has hazarded a
guess.

How much HP is lost from our engines due to the PSRU? I have been
interested in determining what the HP output of my engine is and that info
would be needed for that estimation.

They tell me that most props are about 80-85% efficient, so to calculate the
hp, you take the difference between your climb rate and your glide descent
rate at the same airspeed, multiplied by the weight, and then divided by
33000.

Wt * V / 33000 = HP

This would be the prop HP, so to get the prop flange HP, you would divide by
the prop efficiency, between .8 and .85.

To get the engine flywheel HP, you would have to add something for the loss
of the PSRU.

Is anyone willing to take a shot at that number?? Third or forth chance!
:>)

Bill B

--
Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html