X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from oproxy9.bluehost.com ([69.89.24.6] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.5) with SMTP id 5522446 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 04 May 2012 08:11:55 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=69.89.24.6; envelope-from=jslade@canardaviation.com Received: (qmail 17995 invoked by uid 0); 4 May 2012 12:11:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host296.hostmonster.com) (66.147.240.96) by oproxy9.bluehost.com with SMTP; 4 May 2012 12:11:19 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canardaviation.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=I1xgqbplVgV8iUEmf9Mjwh1Jze2Tc0OALswcBNxKk3U=; b=djoOzPK41TQ00fYgLgG7U6vIcPzIUM0wfL5ouYokanr/duPBdbPtMmziTx0ZCnROqcEzOgxVFnSPmMXIa09gm7nFqbWiEk/niptOqdw9uRcXqTcnCHOwLx2OdTfd1TdO; Received: from c-75-69-3-204.hsd1.vt.comcast.net ([75.69.3.204] helo=[192.168.1.104]) by host296.hostmonster.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SQHLz-0006fi-3P for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 04 May 2012 06:11:19 -0600 Message-ID: <4FA3C760.5070509@canardaviation.com> Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 08:11:12 -0400 From: John Slade User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] At least I didn't.... References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {3339:host296.hostmonster.com:instanu1:trickysites.com} {sentby:smtp auth 75.69.3.204 authed with jslade+trickysites.com} Yeah. Murphy [he has agents in most airports] and the hangar gremlins. They sneak in at night and move things around on you. Good find, Ernest. I cut the wires so that they could only fit one way, and used different colored wires for leading & trailing. Your first taxi was much better than mine -throttle got stuck and I almost rammed the other plane in the hangar. I had 6 feet of skid marks and my wife [who was there for a demo of the engine] had to duck as the wing went by... oops. On 5/4/2012 7:54 AM, Ernest Christley wrote: > Cause an interplanetary probe to crash or an airliner to run out of fuel. > > You know, one of those stupid mistake caused by incorrect conversions. > My conversion trip-up was converting "front rotor" from the car to the > airplane (and ignoring the "F" and "R" that I stamped into the rotor > housings). > > I had fuel. I had air. I had spark. It was just that the spark was > going to the wrong rotor. And I used a timing light to verify that I > was getting the spark. Except I took the timing from the wrong > rotor. I even searched this group and verified that I had the EDIS-4 > coils wired correctly. Connectors 1 and 4 go to the front rotor. > Given that the front rotor is the one in the front on the airplane, > not the car. > > Doh!! > > Once I switched the plug wires around and cleared the engine (turned > it a bit with the fuel pumps and injectors off), the engine kicked off > in two blades. Someone has GOT to develop a cure for stupid, or I'm > doomed. > > Word to the wise. You've verified fuel, air, and spark, and > compression. The engine's spinning with the starter at around 250rpm, > but it just won't kick off. Every few turns, though, it is like > something blocks the engine from turning and it stall for a split > second. Check your spark plug wiring. > > Good news: > - FIRST TAXI !!! It was only about 3ft, but it is the first time in > this ten year project that I've had something to move under its own > power!! > > - The manifold modification is a success. I had the secondary > injectors spraying backwards, away from the runner, under the theory > that it would help the fuel vaporize better. Wrong. It just puddled > in the manifold. A little more fiberglass work, and both sets are > spraying with the airflow now. I cut power to the fuel pump and the > engine immediately cuts out. It used to slowly choke down as it was > sucking some of the puddled fuel out of the manifold. > > - I don't seem to have damaged anything with the backwards plug wires. > > - I've got to rework my tune. Yes, this is a good thing. The > aggressive prop is loading the engine, combined with the fuel actually > getting burned AS it is injected and not after it has pooled a while, > have combined to throw off the current tune. Fortunately, this isn't > very hard with a running engine. > > -FIRST TAXI !! I'm juiced. You guys that are flying better watch > your six. I'm a comin'. > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html