X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail-iy0-f180.google.com ([209.85.210.180] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPS id 5436046 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 23:54:28 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.210.180; envelope-from=david.staten@gmail.com Received: by iage36 with SMTP id e36so3211348iag.25 for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 20:53:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=fnA+3l5T3U87WkhFbFaqiCcUT3s0exorj7QWzGIzHyc=; b=wiOVOyUYzGQvrnwCkEFVoHpubNq1flzA7zCvxq/GSitICWWIJyomn9com/03VuEZzI WawUeWxQdK/s3liKLEQ702cFnajTnkDpbP5xgxb0gxSjN/bK8FI8w8nYY7TDU5YaOl2L z2R6JREJ+F0iJ4gxdPYFBJVxISGPt2bdp8FQGJ1deBdzCg1SaJ5bX8UfP9F9KpNOtMai iGBl1E76/DCBr1SoyzxmbpW4ZmR92aEctqo1zbYt5Eds5vVNjaEsRoWaAUOevcB6Ck6I IxzoswydQRG3iNAhZkQAFw1ZlrPfJpkiluPcTJXNbfg+nzHqhykXRIY5jWZ6hlW29zXB Yirg== Received: by 10.50.153.169 with SMTP id vh9mr7158438igb.41.1331355233164; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 20:53:53 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c-98-197-231-39.hsd1.tx.comcast.net. [98.197.231.39]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dl10sm3912839igb.9.2012.03.09.20.53.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 09 Mar 2012 20:53:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F5ADE5D.706@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:53:49 -0600 From: Dave User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Failure of an LS-1 D-580 type ignition coil References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020606060303080904020404" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020606060303080904020404 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 3/9/2012 10:22 PM, DLOMHEIM@aol.com wrote: > Tracy wrote: >As usual, the in-flight symptom was a rise in EGT on the > affected rotor. > Can someone describe the science behind a "rise in EGT" when we lose a > single coil. I would have expected a drop in EGT due to less thorough > burning of the mixture and therefore excess un-burnt fuel which I > thought would provide cooler temps of the exhaust stream as it passes > the EGT probe. > Must be missing something very basic here... > Thanks for any clarity! :) > Doug Lomheim > RV-9A / 13B FWF The rotor combustion space is long and narrow at TDC. If you ignite the fuel air charge in a rotary at tdc from only one end, the flame front progresses slowly from one end of the "combustion chamber" to the other. Two plugs (and coils) for each rotor are present in order to facilitate complete burning of the fuel-air charge from opposite ends, and to extract as much power from the charge as possible before the "power stroke" portion of rotor rotation uncovers an exhaust port and begins the "exhaust stroke" So.. in an abnormal condition characterized by a single coil failure (out of 4 coils).. the affected plug is dead... and the affected rotor has incomplete and SLOWER burning of the charge than normal. This delayed burning persists after the exhaust port is uncovered. So instead of exhaust gases (which have already lost heat to the block) passing by the EGT probe, you have actual flame front (from the still burning fuel air charge) passing the probe and combustion continues in the tailpipe. That explains why EGT on the affected rotor would rise in a rotary with dual plugs/coils per rotor. A single dead plug from fouling or other causes could also provide the same result. Make Sense? Dave (a lingering former rotorhead) --------------020606060303080904020404 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 3/9/2012 10:22 PM, DLOMHEIM@aol.com wrote:
Tracy wrote:  >As usual, the in-flight symptom was a rise in EGT on the affected rotor.
 
Can someone describe the science behind a "rise in EGT" when we lose a single coil.  I would have expected a drop in EGT due to less thorough burning of the mixture and therefore excess un-burnt fuel which I thought would provide cooler temps of the exhaust stream as it passes the EGT probe.
 
Must be missing something very basic here...
 
Thanks for any clarity!  :)
 
Doug Lomheim
RV-9A / 13B FWF

The rotor combustion space is long and narrow at TDC. If you ignite the fuel air charge in a rotary at tdc from only one end, the flame front progresses slowly from one end of the "combustion chamber" to the other. Two plugs (and coils) for each rotor are present in order to facilitate complete burning of the fuel-air charge from opposite ends, and to extract as much power from the charge as possible before the "power stroke" portion of rotor rotation uncovers an exhaust port and begins the "exhaust stroke"

So.. in an abnormal condition characterized by a single coil failure (out of 4 coils).. the affected plug is dead... and the affected rotor has incomplete and SLOWER burning of the charge than normal. This delayed burning persists after the exhaust port is uncovered. So instead of exhaust gases (which have already lost heat to the block) passing by the EGT probe, you have actual flame front (from the still burning fuel air charge) passing the probe and combustion continues in the tailpipe. That explains why EGT on the affected rotor would rise in a rotary with dual plugs/coils per rotor. A single dead plug from fouling or other causes could also provide the same result.

Make Sense?
Dave (a lingering former rotorhead)
--------------020606060303080904020404--