X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from hub026-NJ-3.exch026.serverdata.net ([206.225.166.166] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPS id 5434879 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:20:55 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.225.166.166; envelope-from=jwhaley@datacast.com Received: from MBX026-E1-NJ-6.exch026.domain.local ([10.240.14.56]) by HUB026-NJ-3.exch026.domain.local ([10.240.14.36]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 06:20:18 -0800 From: Jeff Whaley To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Engine cooling Thread-Topic: [FlyRotary] Engine cooling Thread-Index: AQHM/eQTkZucx3wfX06by8hHn0src5Zh8c2w Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 14:20:19 +0000 Message-ID: <234B758DE9A64449BEB6BB5D1345CA7AF0FDA5@mbx026-e1-nj-6.exch026.domain.local> References: <4F5918AE.1010300@att.net> In-Reply-To: <4F5918AE.1010300@att.net> Accept-Language: en-CA, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [209.87.232.162] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 I think the approach makes sense for the worse-case hot weather environment= but from a northern perspective you have to do something when it gets cold= . If you design a system to cool at 100F OAT, your engine it is going to be= too cold at 0F OAT; in fact it will be exactly 100F less, typically 80F. Right now I'm using grills that block off approximately 50% of inlet air fl= ow; at 0F I add tape to reduce to 25% air flow. This is of course only gro= und adjustable but adequate for typical winter flying. Running synthetic o= il a bit too cool is less significant than running the glycol too cool. My= long-term approach will be to install an in-flight adjustable flap to rest= rict the outlet air of my radiator, which does not provide airflow over the= engine, only my oil coolers do that. Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Ernest Christley [mailto:echristley@att.net] Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 3:38 PM Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Engine cooling Chris Barber wrote: > > Just some data points for discussion. PLEASE if you know some stuff > that is rotary specific, or just wrong, CHIME IN!! > > > > Chris > > Houston > > > > Cooling Guidelines for V8 Engines in Aircraft by Bud Warren and > Phyllis Ridings > > After much thought, Bud decided to install a thermostat in the LS1 > engine of the Ravin 500 to do some test flying. During cold weather > the resulting engine temps have remained stable at 190=B0F at cruise, > and near 200=B0F during climb out; just about what we see during the > warm months of the year. This has corrected the check engine light > coming on due to the engine remaining in warm up mode. This approach makes me nervous. It doesn't hit us much here in the souther= n US, but things get colder as we move north. When it is freezing on the ground, it's very easy to get REALLY cold temps= at altitude. If it is 0*F on the ground, then the rule of thumb says that it will be -40* at altitude. The problem described is that the engine isn't able to produce enough heat = to warm the water with the amount of -40*F air that is rushing through. Th= e prescription given is to force the water to stay in the engine longer. T= his necessarily means that the water will stay in the radiator longer. Now = the thermostat opens even less, because what it pulls from the radiator is = ice water. At some point, the water gets really hard in the radiator and s= tops flowing altogether. The there is no flow from the engine to melt it. = The engine water keep recirculating and it eventually overheats. The Mack truck I bought in the late 80's had a shutter arrangement in front= that would close when it got to cold and block airflow through the radiato= r. I think a thin aluminum panel, possibly controlled by a push-pull cable= from the cockpit, that slid in to partially block the radiator would be a = much safer solution. It would also alleviate the concern over broken therm= ostats. The panel would require minimal support, as it could simply lay fl= at against the radiator face. This message, and the documents attached hereto, is intended only for the a= ddressee and may contain privileged or confidential information. Any unauth= orized disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message= in error, please notify us immediately so that we may correct our internal= records. Please then delete the original message. Thank you.