|
|
Hi Tracy,
Haven't heard any more news since the marriage license purchase. Did
y'all make it official?
I'm still struggling with how to configure my radiator setup for the
Renesis. Tentative plan is still to use 2 of the 30 row oil coolers
(same as your 20B oil cooler), but I can't decide whether to go with
them stacked (4" deep, ~9" x 10" face) & a straight K&W duct
feeding it, or to emulate your setup with them end-to-end making a
2" thick, ~9" x 20" face, with a wedge fed by a modified K&W
streamline duct like your 20B. Either configuration would be fed
from one round 17 sq in inlet on the James cowl, similar to your
intake (my inlet area would be about 70% of yours, IIRC).
The data in K&W for streamline vs wedge seems to be conflicting
(& seems far more conservative than what's actually flying). If
K&W are to be believed, the wedge is less efficient than the
straight streamline, but there seems to be other evidence that low
speed cooler efficiency is actually better with the wedge & the
same inlet area (meaning more flow through the thinner, bigger faced
core). If that's the case, it would seem that throttling the exit
should keep high speed drag down to similar levels as the thick core
with a straight duct.
My question is this: What's your max *sustained* climb rate in the
-8, without overheating?
If you (in the 20B RV-8) can sustain anywhere near the max climb
rate of your Renesis-powered -4, then I'll be very tempted to use
the wedge, thin core setup.
What do you think?
Charlie England
Hi Charlie, I am such a social retard. Diana & I were married on 11-11-11. BTW, thanks to you & Tupper for the inspirational date we had at your place during the annual Pumpkin Drop Fly-in., we set the date soon after : ) Our wedding announcement consisted of the following Facebook entry:
Just another day, took out the trash, programmed a gray box, cleaned up the motorcycle, got married, went to lunch.... The max sustained climb rate on the -8 goes down rapidly above 90 F but I'm very anal about oil temp redlines. Almost all my testing has been done this 'Winter' but I do recall climbing at a sustained 1500 FPM on a 94 degree day last Summer. That is the highest rate I use when doing a cruise climb on a cross country so I was happy with it. When doing recreational aerobatics there doesn't seem to be any cooling limitation. I can do a 2000 foot climb at 3500 fpm at any temperature seen so far. Water cooling has never been a problem at any ambient temperature.
The thin core setup you mentioned is probably the easiest way to go to avoid re-dos of stuff. I would like very much to know if the cowl flap approach will cancel the drag penalty. At this point I don't know. Been too lazy to implement one.
Tracy Crook
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Charlie England <ceengland@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Hi Tracy,
Haven't heard any more news since the marriage license purchase. Did
y'all make it official?
I'm still struggling with how to configure my radiator setup for the
Renesis. Tentative plan is still to use 2 of the 30 row oil coolers
(same as your 20B oil cooler), but I can't decide whether to go with
them stacked (4" deep, ~9" x 10" face) & a straight K&W duct
feeding it, or to emulate your setup with them end-to-end making a
2" thick, ~9" x 20" face, with a wedge fed by a modified K&W
streamline duct like your 20B. Either configuration would be fed
from one round 17 sq in inlet on the James cowl, similar to your
intake (my inlet area would be about 70% of yours, IIRC).
The data in K&W for streamline vs wedge seems to be conflicting
(& seems far more conservative than what's actually flying). If
K&W are to be believed, the wedge is less efficient than the
straight streamline, but there seems to be other evidence that low
speed cooler efficiency is actually better with the wedge & the
same inlet area (meaning more flow through the thinner, bigger faced
core). If that's the case, it would seem that throttling the exit
should keep high speed drag down to similar levels as the thick core
with a straight duct.
My question is this: What's your max *sustained* climb rate in the
-8, without overheating?
If you (in the 20B RV-8) can sustain anywhere near the max climb
rate of your Renesis-powered -4, then I'll be very tempted to use
the wedge, thin core setup.
What do you think?
Thanks,
Charlie
(feel free to post your answer on the list, if desired)
On 10/15/2011 11:36 AM, Tracy wrote:
The oil cooler diffuser was more seat of the pants
sculpting, no math involved. Didn't do any tuft testing but did
blow air with a leaf blower and dangled a tuft in back of the
cooler to see if I was getting relatively even airflow across the
face of the cooler. It did look good. The rad was less so.
More air at the back end so I was not aggressive enough in
pinching down the wedge at that end. Compensated by stuffing some
ridge vent material at the back. Worked pretty good.
Thanks! Count us in for the weekend!
Tracy
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Charlie
England <ceengland@bellsouth.net>
wrote:
Sounds great; are y'all
coming for the whole weekend? If so, we'll hold one of the
bedrooms for you.
Thanks for the mold pics. Did you try any tuft testing with
the wedge on the wedge/rad assembly before actually flying
it? I'm wondering if I can do anything to verify whether my
attempts to copy 'what works' are successful short of
actually flying it.
The success that the Lyc guys are having with exit ducts is
making me look for ways to position the rad/cooler where I
can try exit ducts, & that will mean moving them farther
back in the cowl where there is more width to play with.
Does the oil cooler duct design follow the K&W design
guidelines, or is it shortened a bit?
Charlie
On 10/14/2011 10:54 AM, Tracy wrote:
I'm assuming it is internal
diffusion but you know how that goes. Could be some of
each. Here are a couple of pix showing the oil and rad
diffusers. I did try to gradually increase the cross
sectional area from inlet on but the transition to the
acute angled rad makes this non obvious in the aft
section. The pictures won't show the subtle shapes on the
rad 'wedge' but gives you an idea.
Best info Ive heard on long vs 'pinched' diffusers is that
the short version can be 85% as effective as the ideal 7
degree long ones but only if done properly.
On rad thickness, i think thicker is better on 200 mph
planes but the diffuser and inlet becomes more & more
important. With a large face & thin core rad, even
sloppy duct work will do but you pay for it in cooling
drag.
Looking forward to the Pumpkin Drop. I'll have my new
partner (Diana) with me.
Tracy
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:16 AM,
Charlie England <ceengland@bellsouth.net>
wrote:
Many thanks for the input!
Interesting info on the wedge. Makes one wonder how
much hard science there really is on this stuff. :-)
Is the air flow slowing inside the wedge, or is it all
'external diffusion?
On the issue of inlets/diffusers, as I've struggled
through some of K&W & other info on streamline
diffusers, they all seem to point toward much longer
ducts than what most RV guys are fitting. If I use a
narrower & thicker (around 4") core & have
room to fit a much longer duct on the -7 (core would
be as much as 24" behind inlet), do you see the
pressure recovery efficiency improving significantly?
I'm toying with the idea of 2each 2" cores the size of
an oil cooler back to back with dual pass back to
front instead of the Scirocco style side to side dual
pass. The face would be ~9" wide & 12-16" tall,
depending on what I can find. The oil cooler would be
on the other side of the engine, again with a longer
streamline diffuser because of the extra room
available in the -7's cowl. The cowl does have the
standard Lyc updraft carb 'chin' with inlet, so it's
tempting to go there with the oil cooler, but I have
serious doubts on the inlet size being adequate (inlet
is around 2 7/8").
Again, thanks for the help, and I hope that you can
make it up for the Pumpkin Drop.
Charlie
On 10/14/2011 9:02 AM, Tracy wrote:
Hi Charlie,
The radiator you mentioned sounds like the same
one I'm using on the 20B and I think it's a good
choice. Core measures 12x18x2.65. I used the
"X" option which has 1.25" tubes instead of 1"
tubes. Got it at Summit, Griffin brand. With
tanks and all it is the same as the numbers you
mentioned. Never had any water cooling problems
with it. I don't really know how critical the
wedge diffuser on it is. I'll try to find some
pictures I took of the foam mold for it. It is
not a simple wedge but an elaborately sculpted
shape without any straight lines anywhere. No
formulas were used, I just tried to imagine the
flow, volume and velocity at various points and
shaped it accordingly.
Its hard to imagine too large an oil cooler on a
rotary so I would go with the largest one you have
room for. The 30 row cooler I used is just
adequate for the 20b IF the diffuser and inlet is
right. I was surprised at the difference a proper
inlet made.
I'm itching to do a cross country in the -8 so
would like to make it to the pumpkin drop on Nov
5. Thanks for the invite!
Tracy
Sent from my iPad
On Oct 12, 2011, at 8:25 PM, Charlie England< ceengland@bellsouth.net>
wrote:
Hi Tracy,
It looks like I can't put off my cooling system
design much longer, so I'm looking for info on
what is known to work. I've got the Lyc-style
James cowl on the -7 (Renesis). It looks like I
can fit a fairly large rad on the plug side of
the motor, if I use a wedge diffuser like your
20-B on the -8. I can fit one of the Scirocco
style 22x13 inch radiators (same size that
Dennis Haverlah is using), but don't know
whether I'll need that much area if I can get a
proper duct feeding it.
Do you have length/width/thickness numbers for
your radiator? Also, any formulas/techniques on
designing the diffuser& wedge? Did you do a
K&W type streamline diffuser to feed the
wedge, or just transition the area of the round
inlet to a rectangular cross section at the start
of the wedge?
(I found an email that says you're using a CR
Racing 30 row for oil; I located that,&
proportionately smaller ones, on their site.)
And last, if you're up for a road trip, the
Slobovia Outernational Pumpkin Drop is Nov 5.
Flyer is attached,& we have plenty of
sleeping space.
Thanks for the help,
Charlie
<slobovia11.jpg>
|
|