X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail-yx0-f173.google.com ([209.85.213.173] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1) with ESMTPS id 5157442 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:02:58 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.213.173; envelope-from=rwstracy@gmail.com Received: by yxk38 with SMTP id 38so1375487yxk.32 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:02:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to :message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=f5aNqrRTaXJGAjMU7cd/G9N4Fy1MebsB14pTNJCFtMM=; b=vCXOrVbUpUW9ZGwFXrk2flIqu85E9jCQ6uhaXPsJ/UfWlqUcFbxzVgfZtFeNJA9yDU 3OJ4Vt6GN9En0/ReFiEIwZDTi0AtZgnH7xpLBfO10vA1TdphjONrs4V/56CgddzbUKRu UFu/+xF9FkSWhb7m/BPeM95FtEBz13XPfzwSA= Received: by 10.151.102.14 with SMTP id e14mr10274045ybm.46.1318622542777; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:02:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [75.204.203.117] (117.sub-75-204-203.myvzw.com. [75.204.203.117]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v20sm12248061anv.17.2011.10.14.13.02.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:02:21 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Bill Eslick's EC2 inspection References: From: Tracy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: iPad Mail (8F191) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:02:17 -0400 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 8F191) Thought the group would like to hear what i found when I Finally had a chanc= e to closely examine Bill's EC2. I was hoping to find a definitive reason b= ehind his sudden and complete loss of power on takeoff on his last flight. On powering it up on the bench I found both A and B controllers Working norm= ally. Bill noted in his report that in the 'Fly The Plane' situation call= ed for in a power failure during takeoff he had not tried switching to contr= oller B. It does not appear that it would have done any good this time.=20 None of the parameters were set outside the expected range so no sign of dat= a corruption. In fact the only thing notable about the data downloaded from= it was the unusually smooth programming of the MAP table. Most of the time= I find units returned for updates with choppy looking data in the table ind= icating a lack of care or proper methodology in setting it up. A and B cont= rollers had identical data. =20 The PCM was also returned with the unit so just in case the control panel wa= s the cause I substituted it for the bench test panel I normally use. Thou= ght I saw a problem because the injection pulse width was so large that it c= ould well have caused engine flooding. This was caused by the mixture contr= ol being set fairly high and the cold start switch being in the on position.= This does not prove anything because that could easily have happened durin= g removal of the panel from the plane or while packing it for shipping. Whe= n the switch and mixture control was returned to normal settings the injecti= on pulse width returned to normal. Ran the unit on the bench for several hours while heating and subjecting it t= o vibration but nothing else turned up. Tracy=