X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imr-ma03.mx.aol.com ([64.12.206.41] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1) with ESMTP id 5108957 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:37:31 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.206.41; envelope-from=CozyGirrrl@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-mb05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-mb05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.76]) by imr-ma03.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p7V1aqGO021071 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:36:52 -0400 Received: from core-dsb004b.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-dsb004.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.253.13]) by mtaomg-mb05.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id E31C2E000085 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:36:51 -0400 (EDT) From: CozyGirrrl@aol.com Message-ID: <7320e.24a9630d.3b8eea33@aol.com> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:36:51 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] CG Products Intake Manifold To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_7320e.24a9630d.3b8eea33_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 9.6 sub 5004 X-Originating-IP: [69.153.171.126] x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 1:2:474777728:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 4 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d294c4e5d90330bdd --part1_7320e.24a9630d.3b8eea33_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ernest Christley Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: CG Products Intake Manifold Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 09:42:36 -0400 To: Rotary motors in aircraft (http://lancair.net/lists/flyrotary/Message/56119-H.txt) (http://lancair.net/lists/flyrotary/Message/56119-P.txt) Ed Anderson wrote: Nice clean design! However, I am a bit curious about the fuel connection the two secondary injectors - looks like it would have to be a "hose" type fuel feed or a custom fuel rail design to accommodate those angles. That was my thought, exactly. But then I noticed the screw holes on each side of the injectors. Is there an attachment adapter that isn't shown? ============= Thanks for the kudos Ed =) Yes the secondary injectors have retainers and floating caps on top into which Swagelock T's are installed so that hard stainless lines are daisy chained through. Once I figure out how to attach a picture I will take one and do so. This portion of the manifold is now complete to the silicone couplers and now needs joining to the rest of the fuel system via the primary fuel rail block. This is where we ask a few questions: 1. are pulse dampers still used on the input to the primary fuel rail? 2. what is the best pressure regulator available? 3. we have seen diagrams where the fuel goes to a T then separately to the primaries and secondaries then back together at another T to enter the regulator. We are not leaning this way due to concerns about vapor lock; T'ing the lines reduces flow through each branch by 50%. Chrissi & Randi _www.CozyGirrrl.com_ (http://www.CozyGirrrl.com) CG Products --part1_7320e.24a9630d.3b8eea33_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Ernest=20 Christley <echristley@att.net>
Subject: Re:=20 [FlyRotary] Re: CG Products Intake Manifold
Date: Fri,=20 05 Aug 2011 09:42:36 -0400
To: Rotary=20 motors in aircraft=20 <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
=

Ed Anderson wrote:
Nice clean=20 design!
 
However, I am a bit curious about the fuel=20 connection the two secondary injectors - looks like it would have t= o be=20 a "hose" type fuel feed or a custom fuel rail design to accommodate= =20 those angles.
 


That was my tho= ught,=20 exactly.  But then I noticed the screw holes on each side of the= =20 injectors.  Is there an attachment adapter that isn't=20 shown?
 
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Thanks for the kudos Ed =3D)
Yes the secondary injectors have retainers and floating caps on top in= to=20 which Swagelock T's are installed so that hard stainless lines are daisy ch= ained=20 through. Once I figure out how to attach a picture I will take one and do s= o.=20 This portion of the manifold is now complete to the silicone couplers and n= ow=20 needs joining to the rest of the fuel system via the primary fuel rail bloc= k.=20
 
This is where we ask a few questions:
1. are pulse dampers still used on the input to the primary fuel=20 rail?
2. what is the best pressure regulator available?
3. we have seen diagrams where the fuel goes to a T then separately to= the=20 primaries and secondaries then back together at another T to enter the=20 regulator. We are not leaning this way due to concerns about vapor lock; T'= ing=20 the lines reduces flow through each branch by 50%.
 
Chrissi & Randi
CG Products
 --part1_7320e.24a9630d.3b8eea33_boundary--