X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail-gw0-f52.google.com ([74.125.83.52] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1) with ESMTPS id 5107602 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:53:17 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=74.125.83.52; envelope-from=editor.contactmagazine@gmail.com Received: by gwj15 with SMTP id 15so12046520gwj.25 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:52:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WT0ZjS36YngDJ7GDxwKv5waex/YK04uoXPeMvwuRFgw=; b=SJFV4kuuH+0H3kmZqsDwB/3xCvT02xbqEvjQBqV8a9lEvOGWFZt8ETQDZDay0DEk+x w6lFwI8XjdghcwZl4sszSU/3PgPwK5UZJZuUYJh2TQIG7bu6vB8/GoWm+0FdzA3w7ypX szPgWCO5DHJhQSStP/Nrzx3yU4YTHqAZ9rTL4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.80.66 with SMTP id j42mr28200865yhe.98.1314654760437; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:52:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.36.10 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:52:39 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: panzera@experimental-aviation.com In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:52:39 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Props From: Pat Panzera To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3005147aff864904ababe93a --20cf3005147aff864904ababe93a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 An article by Paul Lipps: http://www.eaa.org/experimenter/articles/2009-02_elippse.asp On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Scott Emery wrote: > Paul Lipps designs some radical props. He has a convincing argument in > favor of more blades but less diameter. Less dia. Means less torque arm for > tip drag / blade. More blades : more thrust. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Aug 25, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Dale_R wrote: > > I can't speak from direct experience - yet - but the reason I'm planning on > a Hertzler Silver Bullet is that several people have found that Gary's two > blade had outperformed the Catto they had made for the same application. > For example, Marc Zeitlin found he liked his new Silver Bullet better than > the three blade that he'd had before. > > Problem is, one of those "other factors" is that for any given output, two > blade usually has to be longer than a three blade. Too long on a pusher and > it gets trimmed automatically on your first high-angle-of-attack landing. > > Dale_R > COZY MkIV #0497 > > > On 8/25/2011 1:53 PM, Tracy wrote: > > Most efficient would be 2 blades. other factors may favor more blades but > that's a different question. > > Tracy > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Samuel Treffinger < > samuel.treffinger@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hey, what would you recommend? A three or four blade prop? It will be >> wood, so weight isnt such an issue, but which is more efficient given the >> same power? >> >> Sam >> > > > > -- > Dale_R > Cozy MKIV #497 > > --20cf3005147aff864904ababe93a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable An article by Paul Lipps:
http://www.eaa.org/experimenter/articles/2009-0= 2_elippse.asp



On = Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Scott Emery <shipchief@aol.com> wrote:
Paul Lipps de= signs some radical props. He has a convincing argument in favor of more bla= des but less diameter. Less dia. Means less torque arm for tip drag / blade= . More blades : more thrust.

Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 25, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Dale_R <dale.rog@gmail.com> wrote:

=
I can't speak from direct experience - yet - but the reason I'm planning on a Hertzler Silver Bullet is that several people have found that Gary's two blade had outperformed the Catto they had mad= e for the same application.=A0 For example, Marc Zeitlin found he liked his new Silver Bullet better than the three blade that he'd had before.

Problem is, one of those "other factors" is that for any give= n output, two blade usually has to be longer than a three blade.=A0 Too long on a pusher and it gets trimmed automatically on your first high-angle-of-attack landing.

Dale_R
COZY MkIV #0497


On 8/25/2011 1:53 PM, Tracy wrote:
Most efficient would be 2 blades.=A0=A0 other factors may favor more blade= s but that's a different question.

Tracy

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Samuel Treffinger <samuel.treffinger@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey, what would you recommend? A three or four blade prop? It will be wood, so weight isnt such an issue, but which is more efficient given the same power?
=A0
Sam



--=20
Dale_R
Cozy MKIV #497
=20

--20cf3005147aff864904ababe93a--