X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imr-mb01.mx.aol.com ([64.12.207.164] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0) with ESMTP id 5056150 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:40:17 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.207.164; envelope-from=Bktrub@aol.com Received: from imo-ma03.mx.aol.com (imo-ma03.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.138]) by imr-mb01.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p6J1dZ3a012538 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:39:35 -0400 Received: from Bktrub@aol.com by imo-ma03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.1159.3cb889c (43987) for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:39:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprly-md01.mx.aol.com (smtprly-md01.mx.aol.com [64.12.143.154]) by cia-dd05.mx.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILCIADD054-d4174e24e04f107; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:39:30 -0400 Received: from Webmail-d121 (webmail-d121.sim.aol.com [205.188.108.130]) by smtprly-md01.mx.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYMD015-d4174e24e04f107; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:39:27 -0400 To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Subject: CAS polairty/Problem solved Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:39:26 -0400 X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-AOL-IP: 50.46.146.205 X-MB-Message-Type: User MIME-Version: 1.0 From: bktrub@aol.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CE13CBD46E9890_C18_24DF8_Webmail-d121.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 33972-STANDARD Received: from 50.46.146.205 by Webmail-d121.sysops.aol.com (205.188.108.130) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:39:26 -0400 Message-Id: <8CE13CBD46C372F-C18-FE02@Webmail-d121.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: Bktrub@aol.com ----------MB_8CE13CBD46E9890_C18_24DF8_Webmail-d121.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I installed some new connectors for my CAS that I got from the Madza deale= rship, they were salvaged from a junk wiring harness, so don't ask me a pa= rt number. Anyway, I had the polarity reversed on the CAS that senses once= per revolution. After changing it, I was able to get up to 7100+ RPM without any stumbling= , and I didn't go any further because the brakes wouldn't hold on pavement= . (That is with a 68 dia x ?? prop, just for ground test purposes) For fut= ure reference, on the sensors, the side of the sensors that are to the lef= t, when you are looking at the front of the engine are the side that have= the lead that is common to both sensors. My engine didn't have one of the= CAS connectors, so I used the small female slot connectors and RTV. Well,= you have a 50 percent chance of getting it wrong that way, and of course= I did.=20 Brian Trubee ----------MB_8CE13CBD46E9890_C18_24DF8_Webmail-d121.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
I installed some= new connectors for my CAS that I got from the Madza dealership, they were= salvaged from a junk wiring harness, so don't ask me a part number. Anywa= y, I had the polarity reversed on the CAS that senses once per revolution.=
 
After changing it, I was able to get up to 7100+ RPM without any stum= bling, and I didn't go any further because the brakes wouldn't hold on pav= ement. (That is with a 68 dia x ?? prop, just for ground test purpose= s) For future reference, on the sensors, the side of the sensors that= are to the left, when you are looking at the front of the engine are the= side that have the lead that is common to both sensors. My engine didn't= have one of the CAS connectors, so I used the small female slot connector= s and RTV. Well, you have a 50 percent chance of getting it wrong that way= , and of course I did.
 
 
Brian Trubee

 ----------MB_8CE13CBD46E9890_C18_24DF8_Webmail-d121.sysops.aol.com--