X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imr-mb02.mx.aol.com ([64.12.207.163] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0) with ESMTP id 5055021 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 01:32:25 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.207.163; envelope-from=shipchief@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-db06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-db06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.204]) by imr-mb02.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p6I5Vldk000523 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 01:31:47 -0400 Received: from core-dde003b.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-dde003.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.53.9]) by mtaomg-db06.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id E64FFE000082 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 01:31:46 -0400 (EDT) References: To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Ok Here are the important flywheel measurements X-AOL-IP: 76.22.118.247 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: shipchief@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CE13231EBE8FE1_2390_2ACA1_webmail-m142.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 33953-STANDARD Received: from 76.22.118.247 by webmail-m142.sysops.aol.com (149.174.9.10) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 18 Jul 2011 01:31:46 -0400 Message-Id: <8CE13231EB0479B-2390-10FCB@webmail-m142.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [76.22.118.247] Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 01:31:46 -0400 (EDT) x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:449439232:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d33cc4e23c54215c4 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----------MB_8CE13231EBE8FE1_2390_2ACA1_webmail-m142.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I just had another thought: You might consider trying another 13b flexplate, but using a more comprehen= sive test for cracks before you put it in service.=20 Look the candidate flexplates over with a magifying glass, then, if they pa= ss, use dye penetrant test or magnetic particle testing? What I'm getting at here, is that your failed unit may have been flawed bef= ore you put it in service.=20 After finding a flex plate that passes, spend some time de-burring and poli= shing the stress zones based on the failed flex plate's cracks; that is to = say, where you think the failures may have started. -----Original Message----- From: David Leonard To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Sun, Jul 17, 2011 9:21 pm Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Ok Here are the important flywheel measurements That is not a bad idea while I have it all apart, as I have not changed the= m out yet. Inspection does not show anything that looks like a smoking riv= et. =20 --=20 David Leonard Turbo Rotary RV-6 N4VY http://N4VY.RotaryRoster.net http://RotaryRoster.net On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Tracy wrote: a kelly wrote: .Did you replace the aluminum rivets in your RD1X damper plate with steel bolts ?..............I= seem to remember that you did after several dampers (and yours) experienced alum streaking around= the rivets........... Just FYI to the group, the change I settled on for the damper rivets was t= o use -AD rivets instead of -A. The tensile strength is about 3 times hig= her on the -AD. Tracy Sent from my iPad On Jul 17, 2011, at 4:45 PM, Kelly Troyer wrote: .Did you replace the=20 aluminum rivets in your RD1X damper plate with steel bolts ?..............I= seem to remember that=20 you did after several dampers (and yours) experienced alum streaking around= the rivets........... ----------MB_8CE13231EBE8FE1_2390_2ACA1_webmail-m142.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
I just had another thought= :
You might consider trying another 13b flexplate, but using a more comp= rehensive test for cracks before you put it in service.
Look the candidate flexplates over with a magifying glass, then, if th= ey pass, use dye penetrant test or magnetic particle testing?
What I'm getting at here, is that your failed unit may have been flawe= d before you put it in service.
After finding a flex plate that passes, spend some time de-burring and= polishing the stress zones based on the failed flex plate's cracks; that i= s to say, where you think the failures may have started.



= -----Original Message-----
From: David Leonard <wdleonard@gmail.com>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Sun, Jul 17, 2011 9:21 pm
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Ok Here are the important flywheel measurements
That is not a bad idea while I have it all apart, as I have not change= d them out yet.  Inspection does not show anything that looks like a s= moking rivet.
 
--
David Leonard

Turbo Rotary RV-6 N4VY
http://N4VY.Rotar= yRoster.net
http://RotaryRoster.ne= t


On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Tracy <rwstracy@gmail.com>= wrote:
a kelly wrote:

.Did you replace the
aluminum rivets in your RD1X damper plate with steel bolts ?....= ..........I seem to remember that
you did after several dampers (and yours) = ;experienced alum streaking around the rivets...........


Just FYI to the group,  the change I settled on for the dam= per rivets was to use -AD rivets instead of -A.   The tensile strength= is about 3 times higher on the -AD.

Tracy

Sent from my iPad

On Jul 17, 2011, at 4:45 PM, Kelly Troyer <keltro@att.net> wrote:

.Did you replace the
aluminum rivets in your RD1X damper plate with steel bolts ?....= ..........I seem to remember that
you did after several dampers (and yours) expe= rienced alum streaking around the rivets...........



----------MB_8CE13231EBE8FE1_2390_2ACA1_webmail-m142.sysops.aol.com--