X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from electron.sasknet.sk.ca ([142.165.20.179] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c3j) with ESMTPS id 4957256 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:52:19 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=142.165.20.179; envelope-from=hjjohnson@sasktel.net Received: from pps.filterd (electron [127.0.0.1]) by electron.sasknet.sk.ca (8.14.3/8.14.3) with SMTP id p3Q0NGvo006106 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:51:45 -0600 Received: from bgmpomr1.sasknet.sk.ca (bgmpOMR1.sasknet.sk.ca [142.165.72.22]) by electron.sasknet.sk.ca with ESMTP id vwhnk35f1-1 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:51:44 -0600 Received: from sasktel.net ([192.168.234.97]) by bgmpomr1.sasknet.sk.ca (SaskTel eMessaging Service) with ESMTP id <0LK8005DBIE8ETC0@bgmpomr1.sasknet.sk.ca> for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:51:44 -0600 (CST) Received: from [192.168.234.24] (Forwarded-For: [216.197.211.104]) by cgmail1.sasknet.sk.ca (mshttpd); Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:51:44 -0600 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:51:44 -0600 From: H & J Johnson Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Mistral 'Like' Intake To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.1 HotFix 0.20 (built Feb 27 2006) Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-04-25_07:2011-04-26,2011-04-25,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-1012030000 definitions=main-1104250163

Charlie, that is exactly what I'm trying to do. I only need the dimensions of the dynafocal ring as a 'check for fit' measurement. The idea is to have the housing/cover fit every standard dynafocal mount out there. Therefore an Rv builder could 'bolt' one on his mount the same as a Bearhawk builder or any other make/model that has a dynafocal mount on their firewall.

Certainly the 'Ultimate' goal from my perspective.

Jarrett Johnson
www.innovention-tech.com

----- Original Message -----

From: Charlie England <ceengland@bellsouth.net>

Date: Monday, April 25, 2011 6:42 pm

Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Mistral 'Like' Intake

> Just to be sure we're on the same page, the scanned Mistral
> accessory
> case should give you more than good enough dimensions for the ears
> themselves. Making the 'ring' for the mount might be a close
> analog to
> floating your own sheetrock, since the rings can be bought from
> several
> different sources, not to mention that almost any kit that uses
> Lyc
> power will have a motor mount available that will bolt right up,
> if the
> accessories are kept within the ring area.
>
> If you can pull this off afford-ably, you're going to be a
> (rotary) cult
> hero!
>
> Charlie
>
> On 4/25/2011 6:26 PM, H & J Johnson wrote:
> >
> > My wife was just asking me why I was drooling on the keyboard.. 
> :)  
> > Once I get those scans in my hand..it is going to be hard to
> find time
> > to sleep at night!
> >
> > This is just incredible! I'm stuck w/ a perma-grin.
> >
> > I just might have to roust up a 3D model of the mount here yet
> tonight!>
> > Thanks for saving me the time of looking for it!
> >
> > Jarrett Johnson
> > www.innovention-tech.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Jarrett,
> >      I found the "Dynafocal" info................Was on my other
> > computer !!..................
> >
> > Kelly Troyer
> > *"DYKE DELTA JD2" (Eventually)*
> >
> > "13B ROTARY"_ Engine
> > "RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2
> > "MISTRAL"_Backplate/Oil Manifold
> >
> > "TURBONETICS"_TO4E50 Turbo
> >
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> > *From:* H & J Johnson <hjjohnson@sasktel.net>
> > *To:* Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
> > *Sent:* Mon, April 25, 2011 11:21:48 AM
> > *Subject:* [FlyRotary] Re: Mistral 'Like' Intake
> >
> > The scanning should give in the tens of thousands [0.01"] or
> less
> > depending on what type of equipement used etc.   That in
> conjunction
> > w/ bolt hold placement that I already have [lots of collected
> data
> > over the years] I should be able to duplicate the basic
> geometry. From
> > there it will become a new product in that we want to make
> > it something that works for everyone [or as many as possible] to
> make
> > it a viable unit. That info, mixed w/ knowing what the
> 'Standard'
> > mount geometry is should get us where we need to go.
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Jarrett Johnson
> > www.innovention-tech.com <http://www.innovention-tech.com/>
> >
> > *----- Original Message -----* *From*: Kelly Troyer
> <keltro@att.net>
> > *Date*: Monday, April 25, 2011 10:03 am *Subject*: [FlyRotary]
> Re:
> > Mistral 'Like' Intake > Jarrett,
> > >
> > >       I do not know exactly what dimensions the scanning give you
> > > such as bolt
> > > hole placement, etc.........I presumed
> > > that the angles of the mount ears needed for the "Dynafoal" mounts
> > > would be
> > > "Dead" on though..........
> > >
> > >
> > > Kelly Troyer
> > > "DYKE DELTA JD2" (Eventually)
> > > "13B ROTARY"_ Engine
> > > "RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2
> > > "MISTRAL"_Backplate/Oil Manifold
> > > "TURBONETICS"_TO4E50 Turbo
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: H & J Johnson <hjjohnson@sasktel.net>
> > > To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
> > > Sent: Mon, April 25, 2011 10:49:43 AM
> > > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Mistral 'Like' Intake
> > >
> > >  Excellent, now I just need to get some Dynafocal dimensions [I've
> > > seen it on
> > > the web in the past, just gotta re-locate the dimensional
> > > 'standards']. That in
> > > conjunction w/ a few scans & the picture will start to really take
> > > shape!
> > >
> > > I love progress :)
> > > I can't say Thanks enough Kelly, w/out the help of yourself and
> > > others it would
> > > be a much steeper curve to get it up to speed.
> > >
> > > Jarrett Johnson
> > > www.innovention-tech.com
> > > --  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/  Archive and UnSub:
> > > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
> > >
>
>