|
Rhino are we talking the Rv8 intake or the Rv3?
Jarrett Johnson www.innovention-tech.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Rino <lacombr@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Friday, April 22, 2011 11:29 am
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: [FlyRotary] Improved performance of my new (2009) intake manifold
> If you want simplicity and effectivity, look at Tracy's intake > manifold. > Rino Lacombe > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: H & J Johnson > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 5:53 PM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: [FlyRotary] Improved performance of > my new (2009) intake manifold > > > Bill that is a pretty wild looking manifold! I can see that it > was intended to benifit from DIE? I've been leaning more towards a > close fitting 'over the top' manifold > > which would be usable for either pusher or tractor installs, > however it would be somewhat simpler than the pictured unit. It > would take alot of 'study' and prep work to > > get a cast unit in that configuration. More than likely it would
> need to be hand fab'd and welded [same as what is pictured]. This > is 'doable' but the added cost of getting > > all those parts together and into a working unit, would push the > cost up past the 'reasonable' level. At least as far as i can tell > from a your picture. Of course I could be seeing > > more complexity there than actually exists. However, that being > said I'm open to all options and suggestions on how it could be > made to work! :) > > > > Best regards > > Jarrett Johnson > www.innovention-tech.com > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------- > > > Jarrett, > > > > If you want to build an intake manifold, I suggest you build one
> that works well like the one Dennis came up with or if he has a > better idea now, try it. > > > > See the attached msg. > > > > I believe that you would have to build this for $500 or so to > sell many and it would require at least 3 iterations, 13B, > Renesis, and 20B. I assume all the early 13B intakes are the same??? > > > > Bill B > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------- > > From: Rotary motors in aircraft [flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On > Behalf Of Dennis Havarlah > Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 3:27 PM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] Improved performance of my new (2009) > intake manifold
> > > > As some of you know I started flying my RV-7A with a cut - off > Renesis intake manifold. In 2009 I installed an new intake > designed to route pressure waves from the closing of rotor #1's > intake into rotor #2 just before rotor #2's intake closed. After > using the new intake for over a year I am still very happy with > it's performance. > > > > I gained about 15 mph TAS at the same altitude and manifold pressure > > My static engine rpm increased 300 to 350 rpm. > > My takeoffs are faster and shorter with noticeable increase in > acceleration > My climb rate increased > > My oil and water cooling is more critical now because I make > more HP. > > >
> But - I must confess I don't believe the manifold can be > reproduced economically. It's just too complicated. > > I also believe it should have slightly shorter intake runners to > increase the performance at higher RPM. Decreasing the intake > runner length probably would require complete new geometry of the > system. > > > I have another concept for designing a Renesis intake that using > a reflected wave from Rotor #1 returning to Rotor #1 . > > I believe it would be much easier to build and small enough to > fit into the James rotorary cowl but because my intake works well > I am not moving ahead with completing the design and building it. > > > > Dennis Haverlah > > > > > > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------- > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------- > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
|