Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #54644
From: Tracy <rwstracy@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: DNA Mufflers No Longer Available
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:28:42 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>


Tracy,
Remind me of the performance of the mighty "Spintech" and its reason for rejection.
 
Thank you.
Lynn E. Hanover
 
In terms of Sound suppression and strength, the Spintech was my favorite.  Only downside was weight (13 lbs) and draggy profile when mounted below the fuselage.  It had flat surfaces but they were so well braced by the internal structure that they did not flex or 'ring' so failure was not likely.   I flew it for about 200 hours on a turbo exhaust port 13B.    I'm going to try it on the 20B after I get a few more hours on the Hushpower II.

Tracy Crook


On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:16 AM, <Lehanover@aol.com> wrote:
Tracy,
Remind me of the performance of the mighty "Spintech" and its reason for rejection.
 
Thank you.
 
Lynn E. Hanover
 
In a message dated 4/22/2011 11:02:48 A.M. Atlantic Daylight Time, rwstracy@gmail.com writes:
Just from memory, I thought the DNA mufflers 'sucked'.   What was your experience Mark?

Tracy


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster