X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imr-ma01.mx.aol.com ([64.12.206.39] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c3j) with ESMTP id 4947717 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:32:50 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.206.39; envelope-from=Lehanover@aol.com Received: from imo-da01.mx.aol.com (imo-da01.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.199]) by imr-ma01.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p3FNW09t031352 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:32:00 -0400 Received: from Lehanover@aol.com by imo-da01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.106f.30ddc78 (55832) for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:31:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from magic-m16.mail.aol.com (magic-m16.mail.aol.com [172.21.188.208]) by cia-md06.mx.aol.com (v129.9) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMD061-da184da8d56c313; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:31:56 -0400 From: Lehanover@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:31:56 EDT Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] 16X Torque and Fuel Economy To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_e6e66.5df502be.3ada2f6c_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 9.6 sub 130 X-AOL-IP: 173.88.24.45 X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: Lehanover@aol.com --part1_e6e66.5df502be.3ada2f6c_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 4/15/2011 1:14:28 P.M. Atlantic Daylight Time, eanderson@carolina.rr.com writes: Mazda claims that the 16X will have double the torque (at all rpm) and better fuel economy at high engine speeds. The Renesis claimed a 20% fuel improvement - but it appeared that was to be found at lower rpm than we operate at. So hopefully the 16X will be kinder at our rpm range. Would not "twice" the torque mean twice the HP? Torque X RPM /5252 = HP Lynn E. Hanover --part1_e6e66.5df502be.3ada2f6c_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In a message dated 4/15/2011 1:14:28 P.M. Atlantic Daylight Time,=20 eanderson@carolina.rr.com writes:

Mazda claims that the 16X will have double the= torque=20 (at all rpm) and better fuel economy at high engine speeds. The Re= nesis=20 claimed a 20% fuel improvement - but it appeared that was to be found at= lower=20 rpm than we operate at. So hopefully the 16X will be kinder at our= rpm=20 range.

Would not "twice" the torque mean twice the HP?

Torque X RPM /5252 =3D HP

Lynn E. Hanover

--part1_e6e66.5df502be.3ada2f6c_boundary--