X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from nm4.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ([98.139.44.131] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c2o) with SMTP id 4891344 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 16:44:03 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.44.131; envelope-from=keltro@att.net Received: from [98.139.44.106] by nm4.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Mar 2011 21:43:26 -0000 Received: from [98.139.44.67] by tm11.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Mar 2011 21:43:26 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1004.access.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Mar 2011 21:43:26 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 530458.19916.bm@omp1004.access.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 88892 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Mar 2011 21:43:26 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1299275006; bh=JWzLh1RGYUMNK7Zu0/8ZpRp7N+8MLfIL/cgZhxtwXzM=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=o4xhBY/K7tiZl7WtHEoMOxm/xqkh2+sRD4EKXx8ZTJpbuDPxKJzgbAqgWTyQdR61QsbPnrMCzvHtVjF4zZUkm4s0sraAY0j9BSum0DMTRhms4uWa9YYPVN5Yn/iiV6eIrO+osGih4DYbX/7tAOcDQ5ncpADkvQ79jbWylsBz1xo= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=att.net; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=z8kbET5Iy1YJBYbR8i5brDNlEBTgFoF5EqWzrlpLYM4gWrhTadm7Q0o+CTf2Sqpr+z+pVaoWQqgQI/tXcGOnwEXrOTpZWLSIXnPAkw4h7tEwP5fjkizf0gM1NRhTiyJ/WXUtJVD3gWrTYLQFcCzni0c2VBtzeyAhQs1YZNSsu/g=; Message-ID: <394220.86332.qm@web83901.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: mlZ7yaYVM1n6zmRBG40IbJ7l94YhBfolFeGn.zefzc3.7sc 1zfS0ORJpXWnH.jJLCzIfRLTZ3PoAAoP_IL0F45O0k_MlpSi17X_LA88B96P s3rBQuGaxalQeKrQKl1ICRpXNo3wGMnN45Q746BrlrUzSmfB.rc9MlxP8E3d q3q9577OMuFpIpHjVRDnwBQ16YTPB8nI9FrJXO_ZHFBpGNlaWL.S95l9BFTr mC5Jkr69MvtR.vrf1xZ67Cc6FcG2pnaW3NDCM4R.vDyrAlmA3w51skB6JMc3 jYnf1ifQIejSA Received: from [208.114.43.192] by web83901.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:43:26 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/559 YahooMailWebService/0.8.109.292656 References: Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:43:26 -0800 (PST) From: Kelly Troyer Subject: Re: Knock sensor and indicator To: Rotary motors in aircraft In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1510159915-1299275006=:86332" --0-1510159915-1299275006=:86332 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dave,=0A=A0=A0=A0 You must=A0have been reading my mind as I had recently de= cided to do=A0exactly =0Awhat you=0Ahave recommended to Chris..............= .Get it in the air naturally aspirated =0Afirst then add the =0A=0ATurbo af= ter any bugs (airframe, cooling, etc) are worked out.............=0A=0A=A0= =A0 Since we have several turbo/rotary=A0a/c flying successfully it has bee= n a =0Amystery why=A0Chris=0Ahas had so much trouble with what appears to b= e detonation and has never been =0Aoff the=0Aground...........I think you h= ave=A0hit on the reason...........I seem to remember =0Aof several engine= =0Aruns reported by Chris at high=A0manifold pressure, high coolant temps a= nd as you =0Amentioned=0Aprobably high intake temps=A0with little or no air= flow across the =0Aintercooler.............=A0=0A=0AKelly Troyer=0A"DYKE DE= LTA JD2" (Eventually)=0A"13B ROTARY"_ Engine=0A"RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2=0A"MISTRA= L"_Backplate/Oil Manifold=0A"TURBONETICS"_TO4E50 Turbo=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A______= __________________________=0AFrom: Dave =0ATo: Rota= ry motors in aircraft =0ASent: Fri, March 4, 2= 011 1:25:40 PM=0ASubject: [FlyRotary] Re: Knock sensor and indicator=0A=0AO= n 3/4/2011 8:43 AM, Chris Barber wrote: =0ASince I have had an issue with d= etonation, I am=A0contemplating adding a knock =0Asensor.=A0 What do y'all = know about this addition.=A0 I do not believe Tracy's=A0EM =0Ahas a provisi= on for a reading, so, what might be a good route to take.=A0 The =0Abrief r= esearch I have done shows different frequencies, types etc.=A0=A0 What woul= d =0Abe correct for a rotary, both as to a sensor and something to=A0notify= me in the =0Acabin?=A0 Thanks.=A0 I am about to replace=A0ALL my apex seal= s and soft parts and =0Ahopefully finally lick this issue....hopefully....d= id I mention =0Ahopefully...determinably...persistent? (heck, I wasn't plan= ning anything else =0Athis weekend )=0A>=A0=0A>ChrisThe stock block roto= r housings have a fitting in between the plugs to have =0A>a knock sensor t= hat ties into the stock ECU.=0A=0AHowever, the response time required, from= what I've read, from the time =0Adetonation is detectable to action needin= g to be taken is very very small.. =0Afractions of a second.=0A=0AI suspect= that all the time and expense you are contemplating undertaking would =0As= imply be to install a light to tell you when its time to tear down the engi= ne =0Aagain, because it would be too late to avoid the damage. =0A=0A=0AOur= approach must be to avoid detonation, not mitigate its effects. You would = =0Aget more benefit out of measuring your intake temp (as an aux temp on th= e EM) =0Aafter the turbo intercooler to see where your charged air temp is = hanging at, =0Aand trying to cool that effectively. Running boost on the gr= ound with no airflow =0Aacross the intercooler is liable to result in intak= e temps over 200 degrees due =0Ato compressional heating of the intake air.= If I remember right your fan is on =0Athe radiator, and there is not a fan= on the intercooler. =0A=0A=0AThere was a reason when we started this that = I recommended strongly about =0Agetting the plane flying in a normally aspi= rated mode first. =0A=0A=0ADave. =0A --0-1510159915-1299275006=:86332 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=0A
=0A
Dave,
=0A
    You must&nb= sp;have been reading my mind as I had recently decided to do exactly w= hat you
=0A
have recommended to Chris...............Get it in the = air naturally aspirated first then add the
=0A
Turbo after any bu= gs (airframe, cooling, etc) are worked out.............
=0A
 =
=0A
   Since we have several turbo/rotary a/c flyi= ng successfully it has been a mystery why Chris
=0A
has had s= o much trouble with what appears to be detonation and has never been off th= e
=0A
ground...........I think you have hit on the reason....= .......I seem to remember of several engine
=0A
runs reported by C= hris at high manifold pressure, high coolant temps and as you mentione= d
=0A
probably high intake temps with little or no airflow ac= ross the intercooler............. 
=0A
 
=0A

Kell= y Troyer
"DYKE DELTA JD2" (= Eventually)

=0A

"13B ROTARY"_ Engine
"RWS"_RD1C/EC2= /EM2
"MISTRAL"_Backplate/Oil Manifold

=0A

"TURBONETICS"_TO4E50 Turb= o

=0A

=0A

=0A
=0A<= HR SIZE=3D1>=0AFrom: Dave &= lt;david.staten@gmail.com>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
= Sent: Fri, March 4, 2011 1:= 25:40 PM
Subject: [FlyRo= tary] Re: Knock sensor and indicator

On 3/4/2011 8:43 AM, Chr= is Barber wrote: =0A
=0A=0A=0A
=0A

Since I have had an issue= with detonation, I am contemplating adding a knock sensor.  What= do y'all know about this addition.  I do not believe Tracy's EM = has a provision for a reading, so, what might be a good route to take. = ; The brief research I have done shows different frequencies, types etc.&nb= sp;  What would be correct for a rotary, both as to a sensor and somet= hing to notify me in the cabin?  Thanks.  I am about to repl= ace ALL my apex seals and soft parts and hopefully finally lick this i= ssue....hopefully....did I mention hopefully...determinably...persistent? (= heck, I wasn't planning anything else this weekend <g>)

=0A

&nbs= p;

=0A

Chris

The stock block rotor housings have= a fitting in between the plugs to have a knock sensor that ties into the s= tock ECU.

However, the response time required, from what I've read, = from the time detonation is detectable to action needing to be taken is ver= y very small.. fractions of a second.

I suspect that all the time an= d expense you are contemplating undertaking would simply be to install a li= ght to tell you when its time to tear down the engine again, because it wou= ld be too late to avoid the damage.

Our approach must be to avoid d= etonation, not mitigate its effects. You would get more benefit out of meas= uring your intake temp (as an aux temp on the EM) after the turbo intercool= er to see where your charged air temp is hanging at, and trying to cool tha= t effectively. Running boost on the ground with no airflow across the inter= cooler is liable to result in intake temps over 200 degrees due to compressional heating of the intake air. If I remember right your fan is o= n the radiator, and there is not a fan on the intercooler.

There wa= s a reason when we started this that I recommended strongly about getting t= he plane flying in a normally aspirated mode first.

Dave.
--0-1510159915-1299275006=:86332--