X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from bay0-omc2-s17.bay0.hotmail.com ([65.54.190.92] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.10) with ESMTP id 4553918 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 12:35:26 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.54.190.92; envelope-from=stol83001@live.com Received: from BAY143-W26 ([65.54.190.125]) by bay0-omc2-s17.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 3 Nov 2010 09:34:49 -0700 Message-ID: Return-Path: stol83001@live.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_d0589c80-b5c6-43d8-83b4-e29c1a3c9394_" X-Originating-IP: [75.174.166.225] From: ben haas To: Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:34:49 -0600 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Nov 2010 16:34:49.0206 (UTC) FILETIME=[085F8960:01CB7B75] --_d0589c80-b5c6-43d8-83b4-e29c1a3c9394_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable They did the exact same thing to my when I applied for a V-8 Ford in my exp= erimental.=20 Ben Haas www.haaspowerair.com =20 To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Date: Wed=2C 3 Nov 2010 11:17:48 -0600 From: bhughes@qnsi.net Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! I would not make any reference to "Mazda" on the FAA forms. I think I submi= tted Hughes Rotary SN 1. The FAA database shows Engine Manuf as AMA/EXPR an= d Engine Model as Unknown Eng.=20 =20 Bobby N416AS From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Beh= alf Of Bill Bradburry Sent: Wednesday=2C November 03=2C 2010 8:38 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! JohnD=2C =20 Your Engine Manufacturer is listed as =93Mazda=94=2C your Engine Model is l= isted as =9313B=94. =20 But your Type Engine is listed as =93reciprocating=94. =20 I wonder why this question has never come up before?? =20 Bill B =20 From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Beh= alf Of downing.j@sbcglobal.net Sent: Wednesday=2C November 03=2C 2010 9:15 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! =20 David=2C mine is listed as Mazda=2C 13B=2C also listed on database on landi= ngs.com. JohnD...N36JX ----- Original Message -----=20 From: hoursaway1@comcast.net=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Tuesday=2C November 02=2C 2010 11:28 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! =20 Check=3B=3B N655HC at=3B=3B www.faa.gov as you will see we do not ha= ve airworthyness cert. yet=2C we are ready=2C have to set up meeting. Davi= d R. Cook RV6A Rotary. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Bradburry" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Tuesday=2C November 2=2C 2010 9:09:37 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! I just checked several other FAA records for known rotary engines. They we= re all registered as =93reciprocating=94 as well. I now know what to do! =20 Back and forth and round and round mean the same thing in governmentspeak! =20 Bill B =20 From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Beh= alf Of Finn Lassen Sent: Tuesday=2C November 02=2C 2010 6:04 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! =20 Actually looks like I was forced to chose reciprocating: http://avadaviator.com/index.php?item/listing/12lFGXGjah0%3D/resources-n-nu= mber-lookup/n993fl Finn On 11/2/2010 5:48 PM=2C Bill Bradburry wrote:=20 I made application the other day to register my plane with the FAA. I just= got back today in the mail a request to clarify the type of engine on the = Affidavit of Ownership. =93The type shall be either reciprocating=2C turbo= propeller=2C etc.=94 =93The type =91wankel=92 is unknown and is unacceptable.=94 =20 Since the engine is none of the above=2C what did you guys use when you reg= istered your planes??? I am at a loss as to what would be the correct typ= e??? =20 Bill B = --_d0589c80-b5c6-43d8-83b4-e29c1a3c9394_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable They did the exact same thing to my when I applied for a V-8 Ford in my exp= erimental.

Ben Haas
www.haa= spowerair.com



 =3B
To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net
Date: Wed=2C 3 Nov 2010 11:17:48 -0600From: bhughes@qnsi.net
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptab= le!

I would not make any reference to "Mazda"= on the FAA forms. I think I submitted Hughes Rotary SN 1. The FAA database= shows Engine Manuf as AMA/EXPR and Engine Model as Unknown Eng.
 =3B
Bobby N416AS
From: Rotar= y motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of <= /B>Bill Bradburry
Sent: Wednesday=2C November 03=2C 2010 8:38 AM<= BR>To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = "Wankel" is unacceptable!

JohnD=2C<= /FONT>

 =3B<= /FONT>

Your Engine Manu= facturer is listed as =93Mazda=94=2C your Engine Model is listed as =9313B= =94.

 =3B<= /FONT>

But your Type En= gine is listed as =93reciprocating=94.

 =3B<= /FONT>

I wonder why thi= s question has never come up before??

 =3B<= /FONT>

Bill B

 =3B<= /FONT>

From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of downing.j@sbcglo= bal.net
Sent: Wednesday= =2C November 03=2C 2010 9:15 AM
To:= Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable!

=

 =3B

David=2C mine is listed as Maz= da=2C 13B=2C also listed on database on landings.com. =3B JohnD...N36JX=

----- Original Message ----- <= /SPAN>

Sent:<= /SPAN> Tuesday=2C November 02=2C 2010 11:28 PM

Subjec= t: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable!

 =3B

= Check=3B=3B =3B N655HC =3B =3B at=3B=3B =3B www.faa.gov =3B =3B =3B as= you will see we do not have airworthyness cert. yet=2C we are ready=2C hav= e to set up meeting. =3B David R. Cook =3B RV6A Rotary.
----- Or= iginal Message -----
From: "Bill Bradburry" <=3Bbbradburry@bellsouth.net>=3B
To: "Rotary mot= ors in aircraft" <=3Bflyro= tary@lancaironline.net>=3B
Sent: Tuesday=2C November 2=2C 2010 9:0= 9:37 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable!=

I just checked s= everal other FAA records for known rotary engines. =3B They were all re= gistered as =93reciprocating=94 as well.

I now know what = to do!

 =3B

Back and forth a= nd round and round mean the same thing in governmentspeak!

 =3B

Bill B

 =3B

From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Finn Lassen
<= B>Sent: Tuesday=2C November 02= =2C 2010 6:04 PM
To: Rot= ary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable!

 =3B

Actually looks like I was forced to ch= ose reciprocating:

ht= tp://avadaviator.com/index.php?item/listing/12lFGXGjah0%3D/resources-n-numb= er-lookup/n993fl

Finn

On 11/2/2010 5:48 PM=2C Bill Bradbu= rry wrote:

I made applicati= on the other day to register my plane with the FAA. =3B I just got back= today in the mail a request to clarify the type of engine on the Affidavit= of Ownership. =3B =93The type shall be either reciprocating=2C turbopr= opeller=2C etc.=94

=93The type =91w= ankel=92 is unknown and is unacceptable.=94

 =3B

Since the engine= is none of the above=2C what did you guys use when you registered your pla= nes??? =3B =3B I am at a loss as to what would be the correct type?= ??

 =3B

Bill B

 =3B

= --_d0589c80-b5c6-43d8-83b4-e29c1a3c9394_--