X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [66.219.56.245] (HELO mail.qnsi.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.10) with ESMTP id 4553887 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 12:14:55 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.219.56.245; envelope-from=bhughes@qnsi.net Return-Receipt-To: "Bobby J. Hughes" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB7B7B.0995A6EC" Disposition-Notification-To: "Bobby J. Hughes" Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:17:48 -0600 Message-ID: <74120FDE88CAFE4DBDA8814BCE20A3F324CDC8@qnsi-mail.qnsi.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! Thread-Index: Act7ZUUuFIBwCCsHT124xJCO80/GYwADCjcg References: From: "Bobby J. Hughes" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB7B7B.0995A6EC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I would not make any reference to "Mazda" on the FAA forms. I think I submitted Hughes Rotary SN 1. The FAA database shows Engine Manuf as AMA/EXPR and Engine Model as Unknown Eng.=20 =20 Bobby N416AS ________________________________ From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill Bradburry Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 8:38 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! JohnD, =20 Your Engine Manufacturer is listed as "Mazda", your Engine Model is listed as "13B". =20 But your Type Engine is listed as "reciprocating". =20 I wonder why this question has never come up before?? =20 Bill B =20 ________________________________ From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of downing.j@sbcglobal.net Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 9:15 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! =20 David, mine is listed as Mazda, 13B, also listed on database on landings.com. JohnD...N36JX ----- Original Message -----=20 From: hoursaway1@comcast.net=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft =20 Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 11:28 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! =20 Check;; N655HC at;; www.faa.gov as you will see we do not have airworthyness cert. yet, we are ready, have to set up meeting. David R. Cook RV6A Rotary. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Bradburry" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Tuesday, November 2, 2010 9:09:37 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! I just checked several other FAA records for known rotary engines. They were all registered as "reciprocating" as well. I now know what to do! =20 Back and forth and round and round mean the same thing in governmentspeak! =20 Bill B =20 =09 ________________________________ From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Finn Lassen Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 6:04 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! =20 Actually looks like I was forced to chose reciprocating: =09 =09 http://avadaviator.com/index.php?item/listing/12lFGXGjah0%3D/resources-n -number-lookup/n993fl =09 Finn =09 On 11/2/2010 5:48 PM, Bill Bradburry wrote:=20 I made application the other day to register my plane with the FAA. I just got back today in the mail a request to clarify the type of engine on the Affidavit of Ownership. "The type shall be either reciprocating, turbopropeller, etc." "The type 'wankel' is unknown and is unacceptable." =20 Since the engine is none of the above, what did you guys use when you registered your planes??? I am at a loss as to what would be the correct type??? =20 Bill B =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB7B7B.0995A6EC Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I would not make any reference to "Mazda" on the = FAA forms. I=20 think I submitted Hughes Rotary SN 1. The FAA database shows Engine = Manuf as=20 AMA/EXPR and Engine Model as Unknown Eng.
 
Bobby N416AS
From: = Rotary motors in=20 aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill=20 Bradburry
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 8:38 = AM
To:=20 Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is = unacceptable!

JohnD,

 

Your Engine=20 Manufacturer is listed as “Mazda”, your Engine Model is = listed as=20 “13B”.

 

But your Type = Engine is=20 listed as “reciprocating”.

 

I wonder why = this=20 question has never come up before??

 

Bill=20 B

 

From: = Rotary motors in aircraft=20 [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On=20 Behalf Of downing.j@sbcglobal.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, = 2010 9:15=20 AM
To: = Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" = is=20 unacceptable!

 

David, mine is listed as = Mazda, 13B,=20 also listed on database on landings.com. =20 JohnD...N36JX

----- Original Message = -----=20

From: hoursaway1@comcast.net=20

To: Rotary motors in = aircraft=20

Sent: Tuesday,=20 November 02, 2010 11:28 PM

Subject:=20 [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is = unacceptable!

 

Check;; =20 N655HC   at;;  www.faa.gov    as you = will see we=20 do not have airworthyness cert. yet, we are ready, have to set up=20 meeting.  David R. Cook  RV6A Rotary.
----- Original = Message=20 -----
From: "Bill Bradburry" <bbradburry@bellsouth.net>=
To:=20 "Rotary motors in = aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent:=20 Tuesday, November 2, 2010 9:09:37 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = "Wankel" is=20 unacceptable!

I just = checked=20 several other FAA records for known rotary engines.  They were = all=20 registered as “reciprocating” as = well.

I now know = what to=20 do!

 

Back and = forth and=20 round and round mean the same thing in=20 governmentspeak!

 

Bill=20 B

 

From:=20 Rotary motors in aircraft = [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On=20 Behalf Of Finn Lassen
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, = 2010 6:04=20 PM
To: = Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = "Wankel" is=20 unacceptable!

 

Actually looks like I was forced to chose=20 reciprocating:

http://avadaviator.com/index.php?item/listing/12lFGXGjah0= %3D/resources-n-number-lookup/n993fl

Finn

On=20 11/2/2010 5:48 PM, Bill Bradburry wrote:

I made = application=20 the other day to register my plane with the FAA.  I just got back = today=20 in the mail a request to clarify the type of engine on the Affidavit = of=20 Ownership.  “The type shall be either reciprocating, = turbopropeller,=20 etc.”

“The = type ‘wankel’ is=20 unknown and is unacceptable.”

 

Since the = engine is=20 none of the above, what did you guys use when you registered your=20 planes???   I am at a loss as to what would be the correct=20 type???

 

Bill=20 B

 

= ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB7B7B.0995A6EC--