X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.27.211] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.10) with ESMTP id 4553087 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 23:29:10 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=76.96.27.211; envelope-from=hoursaway1@comcast.net Received: from omta16.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.72]) by qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id STAj1f0041ZMdJ4ABTUblx; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 03:28:35 +0000 Received: from sz0081.ev.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.26.137]) by omta16.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id STUb1f0012xV6SL8cTUbA6; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 03:28:35 +0000 Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 03:28:35 +0000 (UTC) From: hoursaway1@comcast.net To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-ID: <1004814711.594827.1288754915060.JavaMail.root@sz0081a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <1462055202.594749.1288754756619.JavaMail.root@sz0081a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net> Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_594826_1274852690.1288754915059" X-Originating-IP: [68.61.190.35] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.5_GA_2431.RHEL5_64 (ZimbraWebClient - IE8 (Win)/6.0.5_GA_2427.RHEL4) ------=_Part_594826_1274852690.1288754915059 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Check;;=C2=A0 N655HC=C2=A0=C2=A0 at;;=C2=A0 www.faa.gov =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 = as you will see we do not have airworthyness cert. yet, we are ready, have = to set up meeting.=C2=A0 David R. Cook=C2=A0 RV6A Rotary.=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Bill Bradburry" =20 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" =20 Sent: Tuesday, November 2, 2010 9:09:37 PM=20 Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable!=20 I just checked several other FAA records for known rotary engines.=C2=A0 Th= ey were all registered as =E2=80=9Creciprocating=E2=80=9D as well.=20 I now know what to do!=20 Back and forth and round and round mean the same thing in governmentspeak!= =20 Bill B=20 From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Beh= alf Of Finn Lassen=20 Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 6:04 PM=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable!=20 Actually looks like I was forced to chose reciprocating:=20 http://avadaviator.com/index.php?item/listing/12lFGXGjah0%3D/resources-n-nu= mber-lookup/n993fl=20 Finn=20 On 11/2/2010 5:48 PM, Bill Bradburry wrote:=20 I made application the other day to register my plane with the FAA.=C2=A0 I= just got back today in the mail a request to clarify the type of engine on= the Affidavit of Ownership.=C2=A0 =E2=80=9CThe type shall be either recipr= ocating, turbopropeller, etc.=E2=80=9D=20 =E2=80=9CThe type =E2=80=98wankel=E2=80=99 is unknown and is unacceptable.= =E2=80=9D=20 Since the engine is none of the above, what did you guys use when you regis= tered your planes???=C2=A0=C2=A0 I am at a loss as to what would be the cor= rect type???=20 Bill B=20 ------=_Part_594826_1274852690.1288754915059 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <= div style=3D'font-family: Arial; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000'>Check;;&n= bsp; N655HC at;; www.faa.g= ov as you will see we do not have airworthyness cert.= yet, we are ready, have to set up meeting. David R. Cook RV6A = Rotary.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Bradburry" <bbrad= burry@bellsouth.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@la= ncaironline.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 2, 2010 9:09:37 PM
Subjec= t: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable!

I just checked severa= l other FAA records for known rotary engines. They were all registere= d as =E2=80=9Creciprocating=E2=80=9D as well.

I now know what to do= !

<= /P>

Back and forth and ro= und and round mean the same thing in governmentspeak!

<= /P>

Bill B<= /P>

<= /P>

From:<= SPAN style=3D"FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma; COLOR: windowtext; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"> Rot= ary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Finn Lassen
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 6:04 PM=
To: Rotary motors in ai= rcraft
Subject: [FlyRota= ry] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable!

=

= Actually looks like I was forced to chose r= eciprocating:

http://= avadaviator.com/index.php?item/listing/12lFGXGjah0%3D/resources-n-number-lo= okup/n993fl

Finn

On 11/2/2010 5:48 PM, Bill Bradburry wro= te:

I made application th= e other day to register my plane with the FAA. I just got back today = in the mail a request to clarify the type of engine on the Affidavit of Own= ership. =E2=80=9CThe type shall be either reciprocating, turbopropell= er, etc.=E2=80=9D

=E2=80=9CThe type =E2= =80=98wankel=E2=80=99 is unknown and is unacceptable.=E2=80=9D

<= /P>

Since the engine is n= one of the above, what did you guys use when you registered your planes???&= nbsp; I am at a loss as to what would be the correct type???

<= /P>

Bill B<= /P>

=

= ------=_Part_594826_1274852690.1288754915059--