X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fmailhost03.isp.att.net ([207.115.11.53] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.10) with ESMTP id 4553007 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 21:10:11 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.115.11.53; envelope-from=bbradburry@bellsouth.net Received: from desktop (adsl-85-148-241.mco.bellsouth.net[98.85.148.241]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc03) with SMTP id <20101103010937H03002ugm0e>; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 01:09:37 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [98.85.148.241] From: "Bill Bradburry" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 21:09:37 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0003_01CB7AD2.41F2E7B0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Act62e/Ot+p2ZQ9qSQC9YikEruhebQAGXabA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01CB7AD2.41F2E7B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I just checked several other FAA records for known rotary engines. They were all registered as "reciprocating" as well. I now know what to do! Back and forth and round and round mean the same thing in governmentspeak! Bill B _____ From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Finn Lassen Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 6:04 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! Actually looks like I was forced to chose reciprocating: http://avadaviator.com/index.php?item/listing/12lFGXGjah0%3D/resources-n-num ber-lookup/n993fl Finn On 11/2/2010 5:48 PM, Bill Bradburry wrote: I made application the other day to register my plane with the FAA. I just got back today in the mail a request to clarify the type of engine on the Affidavit of Ownership. "The type shall be either reciprocating, turbopropeller, etc." "The type 'wankel' is unknown and is unacceptable." Since the engine is none of the above, what did you guys use when you registered your planes??? I am at a loss as to what would be the correct type??? Bill B ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01CB7AD2.41F2E7B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I just checked several other FAA = records for known rotary engines. They were all registered as = “reciprocating” as well.

I now know what to = do!

Back and forth and round and round = mean the same thing in governmentspeak!

Bill B

From: Rotary motors in = aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Finn Lassen
Sent: Tuesday, November = 02, 2010 6:04 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable!

Actually looks like I was forced to chose reciprocating:

http://avadaviator.com/index.php?item/listi= ng/12lFGXGjah0%3D/resources-n-number-lookup/n993fl

Finn

On 11/2/2010 5:48 PM, Bill Bradburry wrote: =

I made application the other day to register my plane with the FAA. I just got back today in the mail = a request to clarify the type of engine on the Affidavit of Ownership. = “The type shall be either reciprocating, turbopropeller, = etc.”

“The type = ‘wankel’ is unknown and is = unacceptable.”

Since the engine is none of the = above, what did you guys use when you registered your planes??? I = am at a loss as to what would be the correct = type???

Bill = B

------=_NextPart_000_0003_01CB7AD2.41F2E7B0--