|
|
| Brian,
According to the label on the box, I ordered the inconel 625 filler rod from Incoweld ( http://www.incoweld.com/products.aspx). I found them by searching the internet, so you may be able to do better, but at least they had what I needed.
Mark On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:15 PM, George Lendich <lendich@aanet.com.au> wrote:
Brian,
That's way too much to have to pay.
Worst comes to worst, go to a welding shop and buy some
from them.
George (down under)
Where did you get the inconel rod? Central welding up here in Washinton
wants $35 a pound, minimum order of ten pounds. I've got an inconel exhaust
that is tacked together right now, but can't proceed until I get some 625
Inconel rod.
Brian Trubee
Tracy,
I used inconel filler rod (which I had to purchase from an aerospace
supply firm in California) and TIG welded my current inconel exhaust.
Welding 625 Inconel was about the same as welding 321 SS, i.e. no special
skills requried.
Mark S.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Tracy <tracy@rotaryaviation.com>
wrote:
IF you use thick enough material, even mild steel will
work. I used 321 for 2 reasons. You can go thinner with it than
304 and reduce the weight. I put 900+ hours on a set of headers made
from .035 321 SS with no signs of deterioration (other than the metal turning
a dark color). 321 SS is the nicest welding alloy I've ever worked
with. I tried welding Inconel with no luck at all so I would have needed
professional help if I used that.
Tracy
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Jeff Luckey <JLuckey@pacbell.net>
wrote:
I thought that people were commonly using 321 for
Rotary exhaust systems because it has a higher temp rating.
It's
been a while, but I vaguely remember looking it up, and the max
working temps were something like this:
304 = 1200F 321 =
1600F
So, my question is, are people using 304 successfully for
Rotary exhaust systems. If so, that's great, because it's cheaper
& more readily available.
-----Original
Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]
On Behalf Of Ernest Christley Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010
07:51 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: header
parts source
Jeff Luckey wrote: > Does Columbia now carry 321
stainless. IIRC, I pinged them about a year > ago and they did
not carry 321 stainless… > >
I also bought bends from
Columbia. Their service and delivery was excellent.
I don't
see any mention of 321, but I wasn't really concerned about it. Given the
diameter of tube we have to use for exhaust flow, and the thickness we
need to contain the exhaust pulse, and the corrosion resistance
characteristics of the alloys at elevated temperatures, I couldn't see
enough of a difference to stress over.
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >
*From:* Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] >
*On Behalf Of *kevin lane > *Sent:* Monday, October 18, 2010
22:03 > *To:* Rotary motors in aircraft > *Subject:* [FlyRotary]
header parts source > > > > I have been happy with
Columbia mandrel bending. they make their own > parts, family
run, and significantly cheaper than burns. > http://www.mandrel-bends.com/catalog/ > > last
week I finally got the v-band, another 90°, a flex joint, and >
muffler added to this
header. > > > > > > KevinLane
Carpentry > www.KevinLaneCarpentry.com <http://www.KevinLaneCarpentry.com>
>
-- Homepage:
http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
-- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
|
|