X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from omta3.toronto.rmgopenwave.com ([4.59.182.101] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.9) with ESMTP id 4501607 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:09:59 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=4.59.182.101; envelope-from=lacombr@nbnet.nb.ca Received: from torspm02.toronto.rmgopenwave.com ([142.167.191.1]) by tormtz03.toronto.rmgopenwave.com (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20101011160925.QXWO851.tormtz03.toronto.rmgopenwave.com@torspm02.toronto.rmgopenwave.com> for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:09:25 -0400 Received: from PCdeRita ([142.167.191.1]) by torspm02.toronto.rmgopenwave.com with SMTP id <20101011160924.OQNI12644.torspm02.toronto.rmgopenwave.com@PCdeRita> for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 12:09:24 -0400 Message-ID: <4A7638B7F45B4A00A838B8AC96075F50@PCdeRita> From: "Rino" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Propeller design. Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:09:14 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0046_01CB6945.80D5DB70" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18263 X-Opwv-CommTouchExtSvcRefID: str=0001.0A020206.4CB336B5.0022,ss=1,fgs=0 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0046_01CB6945.80D5DB70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable One emergency water landing and one planned water landing. Good takeoff = at about 1700 lbs., gross weight is 1800 lbs. I had more work to do on = the plane and the pilot before getting to the Water landings and = takeoffs. It is next on the list, this fall. Engine temps is no problem here at this time of the year. I can do full = power, full time and engine temps stay below 200 deg. F. I normally = climb at 100 mph. I can climb at 80 mph with better vertical speed but = it is harder to keep the engine temp under control at that speed. The upper wing incidence is an illusion because of the winglets. I = built the winglets for the fuel tank vents, it raises the vents a bit. = I do not remember the wing incidence but the two are very close if not = identical. Rino ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Bill Bradburry=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 11:00 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Propeller design. Congrats! Rino! =20 Have you tried a take off and landing on water yet? You were getting = a pretty steady climb rate of 1000 ft/min. I couldn't read the temps = and rpm on the EM-2 in the video. What were you getting? The two wings seemed to have very different angles of incidence. What = is up with that? =20 Bill B =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] = On Behalf Of Rino Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 8:52 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Propeller design. =20 Anyone interested in seeing a takeoff and landing in a Renesis powered = Glass Goose go to the following YouTube site. =20 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DR2xPPWD2-bE =20 Rino Lacombe Renesis powered Glass Goose =20 Search YouTube for Glass Goose for more videos. ------=_NextPart_000_0046_01CB6945.80D5DB70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

One emergency water landing and one = planned water=20 landing. Good takeoff at about 1700 lbs., gross weight is 1800 = lbs. I had=20 more work to do on the plane and the pilot before getting to the Water = landings=20 and takeoffs. It is next on the list, this fall.

Engine temps is no problem here at this = time of the=20 year. I can do full power, full time and engine temps stay below 200 = deg.=20 F. I normally climb at 100 mph. I can climb at 80 mph with = better=20 vertical speed but it is harder to keep the engine temp under control at = that=20 speed.

The upper wing incidence is an illusion = because of=20 the winglets. I built the winglets for the fuel tank vents, it = raises the=20 vents a bit. I do not remember the wing incidence but the two are = very=20 close if not identical.

Rino

----- Original Message -----

From:=20 Bill=20 Bradburry

To: Rotary motors in = aircraft

Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 = 11:00=20 AM

Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Propeller=20 design.

Congrats!=20 Rino!

Have you = tried a take=20 off and landing on water yet? You were getting a pretty steady = climb=20 rate of 1000 ft/min. I couldn=92t read the temps and rpm on the = EM-2 in=20 the video. What were you getting?

The two = wings seemed=20 to have very different angles of incidence. What is up with=20 that?

Bill=20 B

From:=20 Rotary motors in aircraft = [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On=20 Behalf Of Rino
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 = 8:52=20 PM
To: = Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Propeller=20 design.

Anyone interested in = seeing a=20 takeoff and landing in a Renesis powered Glass Goose go to the = following=20 YouTube site.

http://www.youtube.= com/watch?v=3DR2xPPWD2-bE

Rino=20 Lacombe

Renesis powered Glass=20 Goose

Search YouTube for Glass = Goose for=20 more = videos.

------=_NextPart_000_0046_01CB6945.80D5DB70--