Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #52439
From: Chris and Terria <candtmallory@embarqmail.com>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Sam Hodges Prop area Comparison
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:58:00 -0400
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

Ed,

 

I will measure next time I am at the airport.  But I know I will be closer to Sam’s numbers.  My prop looks exactly like his.

 

This makes me feel a little better, as I was wondering why my static was so low compared to other’s numbers.

 

I still think I will get airborne again, and actually check out what my dynamic max RPM is before I make any changes.

 

Chris

 

From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ed Anderson
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 6:58 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Sam Hodges Prop area Comparison

 

Hi Chris,

 

With Sam's original prop, he got around 5000 rpm max static.  May have been as high as 5100 but ranged around 4800-5000 rpm.  When He put my 74x88 Performance Prop on he got as high as 6100 rpm one time but each time got at least 6000 rpm.

 

Measure your chord at its widest point - mine is 5 1/2", Sam's was around 8" - not the whole story on a prop, but can be an indication of whether your prop is close to one end of the spectrum or the other

 

Ed

 

Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 9:37 PM

Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Sam Hodges Prop area Comparison

 

Ed,

 

I have the same Catto prop and mine is marked 76x88.  I didn’t get more than 5000 RPM max static either.  To be honest, I didn’t look at the max RPM while airborne, I was too busy looking at the temp, and I pulled the power back as soon as I could.  I hope to fly again with the new radiator in a few weeks, and should be able to get new data.  What were Sam’s numbers Max static with the CATTO and with your prop?

 

Thanks,

 

Chris

 

From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ed Anderson
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 10:46 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Sam Hodges Prop area Comparison

 

Just doing a rough back of the envelope calculation comparing  Sam Hodges prop (8" cord) to my prop (5 1/2" cord) and assuming the two props blade profiles were similar, Sam's prop would have approx 45% more prop area trying to push the air back than my prop.  Small wonder his engine was groaning trying to spin it up to 6000 rpm.

 

Ed

 

Edward L. Anderson
Anderson Electronic Enterprises LLC
305 Reefton Road
Weddington, NC 28104
http://www.andersonee.com
http://www.eicommander.com

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster