Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #52434
From: Chris and Terria <candtmallory@embarqmail.com>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Sam Hodges Prop area Comparison
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 21:37:50 -0400
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

Ed,

 

I have the same Catto prop and mine is marked 76x88.  I didn’t get more than 5000 RPM max static either.  To be honest, I didn’t look at the max RPM while airborne, I was too busy looking at the temp, and I pulled the power back as soon as I could.  I hope to fly again with the new radiator in a few weeks, and should be able to get new data.  What were Sam’s numbers Max static with the CATTO and with your prop?

 

Thanks,

 

Chris

 

From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ed Anderson
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 10:46 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Sam Hodges Prop area Comparison

 

Just doing a rough back of the envelope calculation comparing  Sam Hodges prop (8" cord) to my prop (5 1/2" cord) and assuming the two props blade profiles were similar, Sam's prop would have approx 45% more prop area trying to push the air back than my prop.  Small wonder his engine was groaning trying to spin it up to 6000 rpm.

 

Ed

 

Edward L. Anderson
Anderson Electronic Enterprises LLC
305 Reefton Road
Weddington, NC 28104
http://www.andersonee.com
http://www.eicommander.com

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster