|
|
Sorry Bill, I just reread what I wrote a second ago, and it may have come off as rude. That was not my intent, intended a bit of humor. Sorry if it was taken wrong.
Reason I posted this was from the Alternative engine fly in this weekend in Paducah KY. Sam had a problem with low RPM, and it was immediately remedied with a different prop (but labeled the same dimensions) After running, and a side by side comparison, obvious that the first was a misbuild? mislabel? not sure, but not correct. I have a prop from the same builder, and was wondering about it. Thus, I checked and reported.
Ben
--- On Sun, 9/26/10, Bill Bradburry <bbradburry@bellsouth.net> wrote:
From: Bill Bradburry <bbradburry@bellsouth.net>
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Prop Diameter.
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Date: Sunday, September 26, 2010, 5:56 PM
Ben, What static rpm are you getting
with your prop?
Bill B
-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]
On
Behalf Of Ben Schneider
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 6:28 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Prop Diameter.
Sam and Doug,
I checked my prop this morning. Made it
in at 12:45am, so I decided to
shower and go to bed. Prop measures the right diameter, of
course I have no
idea if the cord is appropriate for the HP. It is a 66 x 85
three blade;
compared to the C130 prop on Sams airplane, it looks pretty
small.
Had a great time Saturday, great to see everyone. Thanks
Sam for the
motivation, I have made some good progress today.
Best,
Ben
--
Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
--
Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
|
|