X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imr-da02.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.144] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.8) with ESMTP id 4389988 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:28:30 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.105.144; envelope-from=WRJJRS@aol.com Received: from imo-da04.mx.aol.com (imo-da04.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.202]) by imr-da02.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o6CHRocf013415 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:27:50 -0400 Received: from WRJJRS@aol.com by imo-da04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.c81.73327022 (56013) for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:27:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprly-da03.mx.aol.com (smtprly-da03.mx.aol.com [205.188.249.146]) by cia-md07.mx.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMD077-5bc04c3b508d2aa; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:27:45 -0400 Received: from webmail-d054 (webmail-d054.sim.aol.com [205.188.91.203]) by smtprly-da03.mx.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDA037-5bc04c3b508d2aa; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:27:41 -0400 References: To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Marcotte Redrive Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:27:40 -0400 X-AOL-IP: 65.113.35.181 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: wrjjrs@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CCEFFEAA3E5661_E9C_53EF_webmail-d054.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 32213-STANDARD Received: from 65.113.35.181 by webmail-d054.sysops.aol.com (205.188.91.203) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:27:40 -0400 Message-Id: <8CCEFFEAA2B49C1-E9C-27B5@webmail-d054.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: WRJJRS@aol.com ----------MB_8CCEFFEAA3E5661_E9C_53EF_webmail-d054.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" John, Thanks for that. I might mention that I have heard of seals coming loose= on several reduction drives. It might be considered a "best practices" to= use a physical locking device on input/output seals that are light press= fit. Bill Jepson -----Original Message----- From: John To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Mon, Jul 12, 2010 9:36 am Subject: [FlyRotary] Marcotte Redrive Bill, the redrive is at my machinist friends shop, but it will probably be= after Oshkosh before they have a chance to look at it. I had a hose goin= g up to a small tank for a vent and no oil came out of the tank and the ho= se has no restriction. The output shaft seal simply came out of the gear= box. I'll keep every one posted when we get the results of a complete te= ar down. JohnD ----------MB_8CCEFFEAA3E5661_E9C_53EF_webmail-d054.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
John,
Thanks for that. I might mention that I have heard of seals coming lo= ose on several reduction drives. It might be considered a "best practices"= to use a physical locking device on input/output seals that are light pre= ss fit.
Bill Jepson



-----Original Message-----
From: John <downing.j@sbcglobal.net>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Mon, Jul 12, 2010 9:36 am
Subject: [FlyRotary] Marcotte Redrive

Bill, the redrive is at my machinist frie= nds shop, but it will probably be after Oshkosh before they have a chance= to look at it.  I had a hose going up to a small tank for a vent and= no oil came out of the tank and the hose has no restriction.  The ou= tput shaft seal simply came out of the gear box.  I'll keep every one= posted when we get the results of a complete tear down.  JohnD
----------MB_8CCEFFEAA3E5661_E9C_53EF_webmail-d054.sysops.aol.com--