Lynn,
Very interesting and informative
discussion.
Could you please expand on this:
Unless a turbo is involved, high octane
fuel is less effective than low octane fuel. Plus low octane fuel generally has
more BTUs per pound.
Thanks,
Bryan
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Lehanover@aol.com
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 9:55
PM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Dyno
In a message dated 7/9/2010 4:15:14 P.M.
Eastern Standard Time, eanderson@carolina.rr.com
writes:
Don't know the answer - however, my view
is at 5500 rpm even with 100% Ve
the engine is ingesting only so much air mass - Which means you can only
throw in so much fuel before you are burning all the ox in the air. I
don't
think that any WOT operation at/near full power is going to vary the BSFC
much from the 0.55 - but, ignore my response lets see what Lynn says.
Ed
As so many quickly point out to us, the
rotary uses more fuel than a piston engine. So you need a snappy comeback to
counter that attack. What could that be?
Oh yeah, well I can run way lean of peak
EGT and you can't. .........And so you can.
Piston engines collect the fuel / air charge
and mashes it into a tiny space that contains the heat of compression and the
hot exhaust valve face and the hot spark plug tip. This provides a charge
temperature not far from detonation. This allows the piston engine to operate
close to the edge of doom for its whole life. The only way to get closer to
doom would be to add a turbo-charger, and they do that too. Detonation is
charge temperature dependant.
But having that mixture in a small hot
package allows for some very complete burns with only small amounts of spark
advance. The closer you get to using all of the fuel in the burn the more
efficient the engine will be. The piston engine has a slight advantage in this
area.
In the rotary the charge is squeezed
gently into a large cold combustion chamber that has no squish areas to drive
mixture to the plugs. Near the apex seals the rotor face and housing are close
enough to stop the flame front. So mixture in this area does not burn.
Much of the heat of compression is lost
to the chamber before ignition. The fuel is trying to condense into droplets
for lack of heat. For the most part, not a good show.
The problem seems less so when we see
that the poor chamber heating makes any fuel appear to have a higher octane
rating than it does. The mixture contains less energy, and the flame front
speed is low. Pressure build up is slow and constant. The better dwell holds
the chamber closed for a long time, and this improves the burn. The exhaust gas
temperature
is high compared to a piston engine,
until you remember the piston engine is heating an exhaust valve to orange on
each cycle, while the rotary is dumping gas at the speed of sound right onto
the EGT probe.
If you mix enough fuel to reduce the
available oxygen in the chamber during the burn, the unburned fuel cannot
combust on top of the EGT probe. So as you lean the rotary, less fuel burning
in the chamber makes additional oxygen available to burn escaping fuel on
top of the probe, and we see the high EGT. This is happening at just lean of peak
power.
So leaning to peak EGT is already past
best power. Our concern here is the apex seals passing over the peripheral
exhaust port where it is exposed to the exhaust gasses leaving the chamber.
Renesis owners my leave the room now. Over heating the apex seal is very bad
Mojo. So we stay well rich of peak EGT until a few minutes into cruise, and
lean very quickly past Peak, and into lean of peak EGT. (Or, switch to the
"B" controller that you have set up for lean cruise. The engine will
smooth further. The burn rate slows, because the clumps of fuel and air are
further apart. (Acts like higher octane fuel) The EGT going down saves the
muffler. Reduces noise. Extends range. Reduces cooling load.
How so? Less fuel=less energy=Less heat.
But also less power. (So the plane slows down)
The BSFC in Pounds (Of fuel) per Horse
Power Hour goes down. Could get very close to piston engine numbers.
The difference is that BSFC is mostly a
function of surface area exposed to the flame. The piston engine has very
little, and the rotary has a bunch. So the piston engine looses less HP as you
reduce BSFC. The rotary looses more HP as you reduce BSFC.
So you compare BSFC at the RPM you plan
to use. So if you have one built you want a copy of the dyno sheet, or look at
a sheet from a similar engine. This will give you BSFC for best power at
whatever RPM.
A number of gags are used to reduce the
poor burn. Like a very high energy multi strike ignition
system. Using more ignition advance. In the 16X dream engine you see fuel
injected late, and directly into the chamber. Unless a turbo is involved, high
octane fuel is less effective than low octane fuel. Plus low octane fuel
generally has more BTUs per pound.
Leaning past best power (Rich of peak
EGT) takes you to peak EGT, and if you stay right there for a while, this is
where the Lycoming swallows an orange exhaust valve head, and blows a rod out
through the case, and the rotary begins to overheat the apex seals in non
Renesis engines.
Power can be (and often is)
controlled by leaning the mixture, with the throttle left wide open.
In the olden days, all of the big radial
engines were run well lean of peak EGT. The only way to get to England from the Azores,
was lean of peak. They carried drums of engine oil in case of a problem. But
never had extra fuel.