Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.217.106; envelope-from=bbradburry@bellsouth.net
From: "Bill Bradburry" <bbradburry@bellsouth.net>
To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-4370773@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-4370773@logan.com>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: idea for solving the takeoff and climb heat problem
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:29:51 -0400
Message-ID: <067C88825686457495A374C400F4A103@Desktop>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thread-Index: AcsUljIy0cdUv8P5Qp+aYF4kEqF6CgAL9X4g

Right.  I was suggesting that it would work as an add-in to the water or oil
cooling system for those that have an adequate cooling for cruise but have
to limit climb due to overheating.  You could select one of the waxes that
have other than 50 degree temps.  Say 90C or so.  That would limit your temp
to about 95C for possibly the length of the climb.
I just thought it was something interesting to think about.

Bill B

-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of John Slade
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 2:42 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: idea for solving the takeoff and climb heat problem

Bill Bradburry wrote:
>
> This could allow a situation where you use less cooling for cruise and 
> have more available for the high output times.
>
>  
>
> http://autospeed.com/A_110772/cms/article.html
>
>  
>
Interesting read, but heres a quote from the article - "Remember, this 
approach would *not* be appropriate for race cars or for cars spending 
long times on boost "

--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html