X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from poplet2.per.eftel.com ([203.24.100.45] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.8) with ESMTP id 4363831 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 03:58:49 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=203.24.100.45; envelope-from=lendich@aanet.com.au Received: from sv1-1.aanet.com.au (mail.aanet.com.au [203.24.100.34]) by poplet2.per.eftel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A589B1735FF for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:58:07 +0800 (WST) Received: from ownerf1fc517b8 (203.171.92.134.static.rev.aanet.com.au [203.171.92.134]) by sv1-1.aanet.com.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 65277BEC023 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:58:06 +0800 (WST) Message-ID: From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Peripheral Port 13B Rotary Engine Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:58:13 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0012_01CB10A2.26FE7DB0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100619-1, 06/19/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01CB10A2.26FE7DB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mike, I suppose it's the latest engine and there would also be less overlap. George (down under) Mark Supinski was flying a P-port Renesis, but that aircraft (Mustang = 2 I think?) was recently totalled. I don't think he ever got it sorted = out and early performance numbers werent spectacular, but he was based = near Denver I think so altitude was a factor. Best reasons I can think of to PP? Power potential and ease of intake = construction/design. Paul L had Mazdatrix dyno a PP Renesis and I think = the HP was up around 245 at about 7200RPM. Not sure why he chose to go = to PP on a Renesis with the side port exhaust rather than a 13B with the = PP exhaust. I'd think that the 13B would be the better choice. Someday I'm thinking I'll build up a PP 13B with RD-1C to swap with my = current 4 port 13B with RD-1A. Waiting to see how Mark's 20B works out. Mike Wills=20 From: Kelly Troyer=20 Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 11:42 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Subject: [FlyRotary] Peripheral Port 13B Rotary Engine Bob, You need to address this question to Mark Steitle who is flying his = 20B P port in his Lancair ES in Austin..............I am not aware of anyone = currently flying a=20 P port 13B................ Kelly Troyer "Dyke Delta"_13B ROTARY Engine "RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2 "Mistral"_Backplate/Oil Manifold=20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- From: "Rogers, Bob J." To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Fri, June 18, 2010 11:56:17 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Peripheral Port 13B Rotary Engine Is anyone flying with a Mazda 13B peripheral port engine? If so, how = is it working? Can you describe the advantages and disadvantages? Thanks, Bob Rogers ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01CB10A2.26FE7DB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 Mike,
I suppose it's the latest engine and = there would=20 also be less overlap.
George (down under)

Mark Supinski was flying a P-port Renesis, = but that=20 aircraft (Mustang 2 I think?) was recently totalled. I don=92t think = he ever got=20 it sorted out and early performance numbers werent spectacular, but he = was=20 based near Denver I think so altitude was a factor.
 
Best reasons I can think of to PP? Power = potential and=20 ease of intake construction/design. Paul L had Mazdatrix dyno a PP = Renesis and=20 I think the HP was up around 245 at about 7200RPM. Not sure = why he chose=20 to go to PP on a Renesis with the side port exhaust rather than a 13B = with the=20 PP exhaust. I'd think that the 13B would be the better = choice.
 
Someday I'm thinking I'll build up a PP 13B = with RD-1C=20 to swap with my current 4 port 13B with RD-1A. Waiting to see how = Mark's 20B=20 works out.
 
Mike Wills 

Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 11:42 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Peripheral Port 13B Rotary=20 Engine

Bob,
  You need to address this question to Mark Steitle who is = flying=20 his 20B P port
in his Lancair ES in Austin..............I am not aware of anyone = currently flying a
P port 13B................
 
Kelly Troyer
"Dyke Delta"_13B ROTARY=20 Engine
"RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2
"Mistral"_Backplate/Oil Manifold=20


From: "Rogers, Bob J." = <BRogers@FDIC.gov>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Fri, June 18, 2010 = 11:56:17=20 AM
Subject: = [FlyRotary]=20 Peripheral Port 13B Rotary Engine

 

Is anyone = flying with=20 a Mazda 13B peripheral port engine?  If so, how is = it=20 working?  Can you describe the advantages and=20 disadvantages?

 

Thanks,

 

Bob=20 = Rogers

------=_NextPart_000_0012_01CB10A2.26FE7DB0--