X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao104.cox.net ([68.230.241.42] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.6) with ESMTP id 4249353 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 05 May 2010 23:25:52 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.42; envelope-from=rv-4mike@cox.net Received: from fed1rmimpo03.cox.net ([70.169.32.75]) by fed1rmmtao104.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20100506032516.TIFM27176.fed1rmmtao104.cox.net@fed1rmimpo03.cox.net> for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 23:25:16 -0400 Received: from willsPC ([174.66.174.143]) by fed1rmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id E3R51e0073600d2043RGJU; Wed, 05 May 2010 23:25:16 -0400 X-VR-Score: 0.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=GWBoNONISSy5wwWPeOR7sPonBBFVX4bzpJNshkMOkOc= c=1 sm=1 a=+Wf/KPGOauV74ukzx3TzVw==:17 a=3oc9M9_CAAAA:8 a=xmOPrOVF6hYtv0FwUYkA:9 a=p6wvKUN8KIIq6RJPWXcA:7 a=NaBKNguATVQWAQ6epfswIxqqalMA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=U8Ie8EnqySEA:10 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=SGUUdE8yqs37Rjv1-8QA:9 a=y96QRq7c6byTASYjDk0A:7 a=hxl2A7InHkOS1l2Y2wPllrmRrRAA:4 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=+Wf/KPGOauV74ukzx3TzVw==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <87E18B8B539B488FBCD1831339DA11A4@willsPC> From: "Mike Wills" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: fuel filters Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 20:25:05 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0071_01CAEC91.0C7C3480" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0071_01CAEC91.0C7C3480 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think if the choice is either before or after the pumps I'd put them = before. Hadnt thought about running the pumps dry causing a failure = (good point Tracy) but if any junk enters the pump that also is a sure = way to make it come apart. Obvious best option is both sides. Tracy, thanks for the mention of those Peterson filters. They look = pretty good. The website I found didn't give any physical dimensions = that I could find though. Got a good web link? Mike From: Bktrub@aol.com=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 9:32 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: fuel filters After the fuel pumps. I have two fuel pumps, and I figure that they are = less susceptible to clogging than the injectors. Why? Does this raise = any flags? Brian Trubee ------=_NextPart_000_0071_01CAEC91.0C7C3480 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I think if the choice is either = before or=20 after the pumps I'd put them before. Hadnt thought about running the = pumps dry=20 causing a failure (good point Tracy) but if any junk enters the pump = that also=20 is a sure way to make it come apart. Obvious best option is both=20 sides.
 
Tracy, thanks for the mention of = those Peterson=20 filters. They look pretty good. The website I found didn=92t give any = physical=20 dimensions that I could find though. Got a good web = link?
 
Mike

Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 9:32 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: fuel filters

After the fuel pumps. I have two fuel pumps, and I figure that they = are=20 less susceptible to clogging than the injectors. Why? Does this raise = any=20 flags?
 
Brian Trubee
 ------=_NextPart_000_0071_01CAEC91.0C7C3480--