Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #50585
From: Mike Wills <rv-4mike@cox.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo Planning
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:13:47 -0700
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
The articles appeared in the October and November 2009 issues, written by Kevin Horton, RV-8 builder and professional test pilot. The ss (attached) includes a couple of different variants. The 4 leg calculation is a more robust approach that also provides a std deviation number which will sanity check your results. The numbers in the ss were from one of my early tests on a windy day - didn’t do a very good job of holding airspeed/altitude reflected by the high std dev. Read the articles for details.
 
Mike Wills

Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 6:02 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo Planning

Mike,
I missed the Kitplanes article, if you could forward the spread sheet, I would appreciate it.
 
Bill Schertz
KIS Cruiser #4045
N343BS
Phase I testing

From: Mike Wills
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:11 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo Planning

Bill,
 
 Agreed, speeds at 8,000 need to be calibrated. I doubt there's anyone here who has gone to the trouble of installing this engine with all the associated electronics that doesn’t have a GPS. Its not a "dreaded calculation". The 4 course method of determining TAS based on groundspeed is well established and very straightforward. It was published in Kitplanes about a year ago and has been converted into a simple Excel spread sheet. I can forward it to anyone who wants it if you cant find it yourself. It takes all the guesswork out and provides a meaningful number that is perhaps not absolute, but accepted and used by the Navy Test Pilot School at Pax River, MD among others.
 
Also agreed that within the RPM ranges we operate in there is a relatively linear HP response to RPM. The numbers you gave in your initial email were, " horsepower is around 150 at 6K, maybe 180 at 7K, and 200 at 7.5K". I believe 250HP @ 7500 is within the range you mentioned - you stated 200 @7.5K. I'd be happy with an extra 50HP. 7500RPM is a good target number for max RPM straight and level near sea level - even with a wood FP prop.
 
Mike Wills

Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 7:28 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo Planning

Hi Mike,

I am gonna have to let Don tell us his speeds, but he was at 8000 feet so indicated speed will have to go thru the dreaded calculation as well in order to find the true airspeed..  :>)   since airplanes fly in the air and don’t touch the ground (except occasionally) every speed you see will be some kind of calculation and not a “fact”.

Maybe he has a GPS and can fly some kind of rectangular pattern and find the average (no wind) speed.???

 

Maybe you can get a copy of Paul’s dyno sheet and take a look at the horsepower he was producing at the lower rpms I mentioned.  I will bet they are very close to the numbers I mentioned.  Mazda used to claim that the Renesis produced 250 @ 7500, but they have since backed it off to, I think, 238 @ maybe 8500.

 

The point I was trying to make about the rotary was that your HP is based on rpm.  All those high HP numbers are all at really high rpm.  Much higher than we run in the plane, unless, like Mark Steitle, you have a CS prop.

Mark gets (I think I saw him say) 7500 on takeoff and although I haven’t heard him say, I assume he can get the same in cruise as well.

 

Bill B

 


From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Mike Wills
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 9:37 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo Planning

Sorry, not buying it Bill. If you are going to quote speeds here, quote speeds, not calculated speeds based on so many variables that the end result is meaningless. That sounds like something we'd see on the other list, not here. As far as I know, Don's best reported speed is 174 IAS (and IAS is not all that meaningful either). Based on performance that Don has actually reported his performance is roughly equivalent to mine (and I'm both prop and gearing limited). His performance may have improved since he reported those numbers. In any case I'd prefer to stick to facts.

 

Speaking of the other list, Paul has video of a PP Renesis on a dyno  at Mazdatrix cranking out near 250HP @7500RPM. And he had the dyno sheet to prove it. Powersport claimed 210HP at 2700 prop RPM (their reduction ratio was around 2.2; roughly 6000 engine RPM). I believe they also had dyno data to prove it. I'm anxious to hear how Mark Stietle's PP 20B performs.

 

Mike Wills

 

Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 6:25 AM

Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo Planning

 

Mike,

Don didn’t report speed.  I took his pitch and rpm and figured it.  That speed at cruise is what he would get with no slippage or “lift” from the prop.  Most of the folks with the Catto are actually getting higher speeds than would be calculated which indicates that the prop is producing “lift”, not slippage. 

 

But his engine rpm with that big prop are higher than any I have seen.  With the rotary, rpm = horsepower.  If you aint making the rpm, you aint making the horsepower.  It doesn’t seem to matter what you have done to the engine…ported, PP, turbo, supercharger.  If you look at the dyno charts that are all over the web, you will see that torque is pretty flat after about 4K, about 150 ft lbs.  The horsepower is around 150 at 6K, maybe 180 at 7K, and 200 at 7.5K.  You can get more horsepower than that, but only if you scream it up to 8K  or 8.5K.  All the charts I have seen are within 10 horsepower of each other at all rpms.  The difference in total horsepower is always a higher max rpm.

 

We all talk about wanting to cruise at 5800 and make 200 horsepower…it aint happening!  Not with the rotary.

 

Bill B

 


From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Mike Wills
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:17 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo Planning

Bill,

 

I went back and looked at Don's previous post. Saw reference to climb performance, RPMs, and temps, but no speed numbers. Has he previously reported cruise speeds over 200? Last post from him that I saw with any speed numbers reported 174MPH IAS at 8000. If he's over 200 now, wow those are good numbers!

 

Mike Wills

 

Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 9:15 PM

Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo Planning

 

Those are the best numbers I have seen with anyone with a Renesis so far.  In fact, I have not heard of numbers that good on any 13B.  Don is getting over 200 MPH with a cruise prop and climbing at over 1400 fpm with it.  The only way he is going to do better is either with an electric CS prop and/or turbo.  If he shaves the prop off to say, 74”, he will get a couple hundred more rpm, but will probably lose in total thrust.  Diameter is a big determiner in thrust. 

 

I would like more pictures of Dons intake and exhaust!

 

Bill B

 


From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Al Gietzen
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:05 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo Planning

1. When I read your stats in your first paragraph, the first thought that

comes to mind is that there is too much prop. 

 

Ditto.

 

Al G

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster