Hi Mike,
I am gonna have to let Don tell us his speeds, but he was at 8000 feet
so indicated speed will have to go thru the dreaded calculation as well in
order to find the true airspeed.. :>) since airplanes fly
in the air and don’t touch the ground (except occasionally) every speed
you see will be some kind of calculation and not a “fact”.
Maybe he has a GPS and can fly some kind of rectangular pattern and find
the average (no wind) speed.???
Maybe you can get a copy of Paul’s dyno sheet and take a look at
the horsepower he was producing at the lower rpms I mentioned. I will bet
they are very close to the numbers I mentioned. Mazda used to claim that
the Renesis produced 250 @ 7500, but they have since backed it off to, I think,
238 @ maybe 8500.
The point I was trying to make about the rotary was that your HP is based
on rpm. All those high HP numbers are all at really high rpm. Much higher
than we run in the plane, unless, like Mark Steitle, you have a CS prop.
Mark gets (I think I saw him say) 7500 on takeoff and although I haven’t
heard him say, I assume he can get the same in cruise as well.
Bill B
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Mike Wills
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010
9:37 PM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo
Planning
Sorry, not buying it Bill. If you are going to quote
speeds here, quote speeds, not calculated speeds based on so many variables
that the end result is meaningless. That sounds like something we'd see on the
other list, not here. As far as I know, Don's best reported speed is 174 IAS
(and IAS is not all that meaningful either). Based on performance that Don
has actually reported his performance is roughly equivalent to mine (and
I'm both prop and gearing limited). His performance may have improved
since he reported those numbers. In any case I'd prefer to stick to facts.
Speaking of the other list, Paul has video of a PP
Renesis on a dyno at Mazdatrix cranking out near 250HP @7500RPM. And he
had the dyno sheet to prove it. Powersport claimed 210HP at 2700 prop RPM
(their reduction ratio was around 2.2; roughly 6000 engine RPM). I believe
they also had dyno data to prove it. I'm anxious to hear how Mark Stietle's PP
20B performs.
Sent: Thursday,
March 25, 2010 6:25 AM
Subject:
[FlyRotary] Re: Turbo Planning
Mike,
Don didn’t report speed. I took his pitch and rpm and
figured it. That speed at cruise is what he would get with no slippage or
“lift” from the prop. Most of the folks with the Catto are
actually getting higher speeds than would be calculated which indicates that
the prop is producing “lift”, not slippage.
But his engine rpm with that big prop are higher than any I have
seen. With the rotary, rpm = horsepower. If you aint making the
rpm, you aint making the horsepower. It doesn’t seem to matter what
you have done to the engine…ported, PP, turbo, supercharger. If you
look at the dyno charts that are all over the web, you will see that torque is
pretty flat after about 4K, about 150 ft lbs. The horsepower is around
150 at 6K, maybe 180 at 7K, and 200 at 7.5K. You can get more horsepower
than that, but only if you scream it up to 8K or 8.5K. All the
charts I have seen are within 10 horsepower of each other at all rpms.
The difference in total horsepower is always a higher max rpm.
We all talk about wanting to cruise at 5800 and make 200
horsepower…it aint happening! Not with the rotary.
Bill B
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Mike Wills
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010
1:17 AM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo
Planning
I went back and looked at Don's previous post. Saw
reference to climb performance, RPMs, and temps, but no speed numbers. Has he
previously reported cruise speeds over 200? Last post from him that I saw with
any speed numbers reported 174MPH IAS at 8000. If he's over 200 now, wow
those are good numbers!
Sent:
Wednesday, March 24, 2010 9:15 PM
Subject:
[FlyRotary] Re: Turbo Planning
Those are the best numbers I have seen with anyone with a Renesis so
far. In fact, I have not heard of numbers that good on any 13B. Don
is getting over 200 MPH with a cruise prop and climbing at over 1400 fpm with
it. The only way he is going to do better is either with an electric CS
prop and/or turbo. If he shaves the prop off to say, 74”, he will
get a couple hundred more rpm, but will probably lose in total thrust.
Diameter is a big determiner in thrust.
I would like more pictures of Dons intake and exhaust!
Bill B
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Al Gietzen
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010
3:05 AM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo
Planning
1.
When I read your stats in your first paragraph, the first thought that
comes
to mind is that there is too much prop.
Ditto.
Al G