X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from securemail.ever-tek.com ([64.129.170.194] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.4) with ESMTP id 4171070 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:19:33 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.129.170.194; envelope-from=cbarber@texasattorney.net Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2D41F9BF3B5F9842B164AF93214F3D30045984C2FCDMAIL06FCDATA_" Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:19:07 +0000 From: Chris Barber In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <2D41F9BF3B5F9842B164AF93214F3D30045984C2@FCD-MAIL06.FCDATA.PRIVATE> MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from fcd-mail06.FCDATA.PRIVATE ([2002:404:40b::404:40b]) byFCD-MAIL06.FCDATA.PRIVATE ([2002:404:40b::404:40b]) with mapi; Thu, 18 Mar2010 19:19:09 -0500 References: Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo Considerations....careful, its long Thread-Index: AQHKxeSg81vGzGwIp0egZh7LiCWnjpH4Y9Sa Thread-Topic: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo Considerations....careful, its long To: Rotary motors in aircraft X-Modus-SURBL: =OK X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: --_000_2D41F9BF3B5F9842B164AF93214F3D30045984C2FCDMAIL06FCDATA_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable John, Thanks for the response. You are one that I was hoping would chime in. It looks as if I will go sans ceramic bearings unless some additional knowl= edge is provided. O course, I could get a wild hair and get 'em anyway, bu= t I may be creating another, unkown problem, not to mention a possible mean= inless expense. I don't know if any of y'all have noticed but this can be = a bit expensive as a hobby . Yes, I followed your earlier turbo delimas. Yikes! I agree, it is difficult to know who is a "true" expert. Various sources, = such as forums, does provide data points that may lead to solid useful info= rmation. A conscecious is nice and provides some reassurance, but it may a= ll be dead wrong...so to speak. But, conventional reason can be a nice pla= ce to start. I remember the discussion on the canardaviation site. It was part of the a= rchival research I have just been doing. The info from rv6guy (turboguy...= .? or some such variation) was very useful. Of course thread shift and dow= nright hyjacking was/is a problem there too. (the owner of the canard commu= nity seems, as nice a guy with good intent as he seems to be on his visits = to my project was particulary guilty of this....HEAR that Dust ....oh, I= doubt he would ever visti a rotary site ). I too was provided great reassurance by the same choice being made by the G= rrls. I have learned to have faith in their knowledge and skill. I loved = meeting them a while back when they visited Houston. Their pressance only = reinforced my trust in their ability. Hmmmmm, a visit to Albany...that may be doable. I really appreciate the of= fer. Hmmmmmm? All the best, Chris Barber Houston, GSOT ________________________________ From: Rotary motors in aircraft [flyrotary@lancaironline.net] on behalf of = John Slade [jslade@canardaviation.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 10:13 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo Considerations....careful, its long Hi Chris, I can provide one piece of second hand information and a lot of sympathy...= . With regard to the ceramic bearings, I was told that the extra expense wasn= 't necessary, and that the 'big shaft' had been proved to hold up on an air= craft, while no-one (he or I knew) had yet flown ceramic bearings. On the sympathy side - I can relate to your agony here. After blowing two= stock turbos and one modified hybrid (one of which was at 11,000' and took= out my apex seals) I was, shall we say, under a little more pressure to ge= t the decision right this time. After studying turbo maps and specs and reading everything I could find, I = eventually took the same logic on the turbo choice that I did on the engine= rebuild and on aluminum welding - "this is something you learn to be an ex= pert in over many years, not months. I do not have the time or tenacity to = become a true expert in this field, and I don't wish to employ the skills o= f an amateur (me) .... so I need to use the skills of someone who IS a true= expert." Next problem - how do you know who is a true expert and who is ju= st claiming to be one? I came across a turbo guy on the http://canardaviation.com forum (the initi= al communications should be in the archive) who was flying a turbo powered = Subaru and seemed like a true expert. I think he's in Canada. He'd been "in= to turbos" all his life and certainly sounded like he knew what he was talk= ing about. I gave him all my specs in terms of engine, planned flight regim= e and usage, and he came back with the list of goodies I now have. As with = all critical recommendations, I checked with others whose knowledge I'd gai= ned a healthy respect for. The Cozy Girrrls had independently arrived at al= most exactly the same choices, except that they wanted more power at higher= altitudes than me, so they choose the 9.6 aspect ratio which would provide= less on take-off, but more over 18,000'. I had specified a max cruise alti= tude of 15,000'. Greg Richter also used a Turbonetics, but without an auto = wastegate. Leon in Aussie (another true expert who used to contribute heavi= ly to this list) agreed that the specs and manufacturers were appropriate. = At that point I put all the agony behind me and purchased EXACTLY what I wa= s told would work. Thankfully (once I put the suction on the correct side o= f the wastegate :) it did work and I've had no further turbo issues. The pu= sh in your back on take-off feels like a Porche. I do the take-off based on= the manifold pressure keeping it below about 42 which equates to just over= half throttle. I think the late great Paul Conner said it best after flyi= ng in Dan Crugar's 0360 powered Cozy IV, then taking mine for a high speed = taxi test. "Wooooo!" You, of course, have an advantage over me - You can follow and examine my i= nstallation. The cost of a commercial flight into West Palm (or Albany afte= r early May) would be minor compared to the value gained. You'd be welcome = any time. Regards, John -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.= html --_000_2D41F9BF3B5F9842B164AF93214F3D30045984C2FCDMAIL06FCDATA_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
John, 
 
Thanks for the response.  You are one that I was hoping would chi= me in.
 
It looks as if I will go sans ceramic bearings unless some additional = knowledge is provided.  O course, I could get a wild hair and get 'em<= a> anyway, but I may be creating another, unkown problem, n= ot to mention a possible meaninless expense.  I don't know if any of y'all have noticed but this can be a= bit expensive as a hobby <g>.
 
Yes, I followed your earlier turbo delimas.  Yikes!  =
 
I agree, it is difficult to know who is a "true" expert.&nbs= p; Various sources, such as forums, does provide data points that may lead = to solid useful information.  A conscecious is nice and pr= ovides some reassurance, but it may all be dead wrong...so to speak.  But, conventional reason can be a nice place to start.
 
I remember the discussion on the canardaviation site. = ; It was part of the archival research I have just been doing.  The in= fo from rv6guy (turboguy....? or some such variation) wa= s very useful.  Of course thread shift and downright hyjacking= was/is a problem there too. (the owner of the canard community seems, as n= ice a guy with good intent as he seems to be on his visits to my project wa= s particulary guilty of this....HEAR that Dust <g>....oh,= I doubt he would ever visti a rotary site <g>).
 
I too was provided great reassurance by the same choice being made by = the Grrls.  I have learned to have faith in their knowledge and= skill.  I loved meeting them a while back when they visited Houston.&= nbsp; Their pressance only reinforced my trust in their ability.
 
Hmmmmm, a visit to Albany...that may be doable.  I really = appreciate the offer.  Hmmmmmm?
 
All the best,
 
Chris Barber
Houston, GSOT
From: Rotary motors in aircraft [flyrotary= @lancaironline.net] on behalf of John Slade [jslade@canardaviation.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 10:13 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Turbo Considerations....careful, its long

Hi Chris,
I can provide one piece of second hand information and a lot of sympathy...= .
With regard to the ceramic bearings, I was told that the extra expense wasn= 't necessary, and that the 'big shaft' had been proved to hold up on an air= craft, while no-one (he or I knew) had yet flown ceramic bearings.

On the sympathy side - I can relate to your  agony here.  After b= lowing two stock turbos and one modified hybrid (one of which was at 11,000= ' and took out my apex seals) I was, shall we say, under a little more pres= sure to get the decision right this time.

After studying turbo maps and specs and reading everything I could find, I = eventually took the same logic on the turbo choice that I did on the engine= rebuild and on aluminum welding - "this is something you learn to be an expert in over many years, no= t months. I do not have the time or tenacity to become a true expert in thi= s field, and I don't wish to employ the skills of an amateur (me) .... so I= need to use the skills of someone who IS a true expert." Next problem - how do you know who is a true e= xpert and who is just claiming to be one?

I came across a turbo guy on the http://canardaviation.com forum (the initial communications should be i= n the archive) who was flying a turbo powered Subaru and seemed like a true= expert. I think he's in Canada. He'd been "into turbos" all his = life and certainly sounded like he knew what he was talking about. I gave him all my specs in terms of engine, planned = flight regime and usage, and he came back with the list of goodies I now ha= ve. As with all critical recommendations, I checked with others whose knowl= edge I'd gained a healthy respect for. The Cozy Girrrls had independently arrived at almost exactly the same= choices, except that they wanted more power at higher altitudes than me, s= o they choose the 9.6 aspect ratio which would provide less on take-off, bu= t more over 18,000'. I had specified a max cruise altitude of 15,000'. Greg Richter also used a Turbonetics, bu= t without an auto wastegate. Leon in Aussie (another true expert who used t= o contribute heavily to this list) agreed that the specs and manufacturers = were appropriate. At that point I put all the agony behind me and purchased EXACTLY what I was told would = work. Thankfully (once I put the suction on the correct side of the wastega= te :) it did work and I've had no further turbo issues. The push in your ba= ck on take-off feels like a Porche. I do the take-off based on the manifold pressure keeping it below about 42= which equates to just over half throttle.  I think the late great Pau= l Conner said it best after flying in Dan Crugar's 0360 powered Cozy IV, th= en taking mine for a high speed taxi test. "Wooooo!"

You, of course, have an advantage over me - You can follow and examine my i= nstallation. The cost of a commercial flight into West Palm (or Albany afte= r early May) would be minor compared to the value gained. You'd be welcome = any time.

Regards,
John

--

Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/

Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.=
html
--_000_2D41F9BF3B5F9842B164AF93214F3D30045984C2FCDMAIL06FCDATA_--