Return-Path: <pcasson@sasktel.net>
Received: from misav03.sasknet.sk.ca ([142.165.20.164] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8)
  with ESMTP id 2911523 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 22:49:20 -0500
Received: from oregano.sasktel.net ([142.165.20.197]) by misav03 with InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:49:19 -0600
Received: from sasktel.net
 (hsdbrg142-165-194-197.sasknet.sk.ca [142.165.194.197])
 by oregano.sasktel.net (SaskTel eMessaging Service)
 with ESMTPSA id <0HQQ00JHYQM6EH@oregano.sasktel.net> for
 flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:49:18 -0600 (CST)
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 22:50:12 -0500
From: Perry Casson <pcasson@sasktel.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] exhaust flange?
In-reply-to: <list-2911360@logan.com>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message-id: <3FF24774.7000602@sasktel.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b)
 Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
References: <list-2911360@logan.com>

There should be no problem using the RB flange.   Weld the pipes to the 
flange  from the  inside as per the RB instructions and use 309 filler rod.

Perry Casson


Russell Duffy wrote:

> Greetings again,
>  
> I'll be using 321 SS for the exhaust pipes, but is there any problem 
> with using the Racing Beat header flange at the engine?  This is 1/2" 
> mild steel, and I just happen to have two of them.  They are heavy, 
> and I might think about cutting it into two separate flanges, since 
> I'll have ball joints on the exhaust pipe. 
>  
> Thanks,
> Rusty
>