X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao105.cox.net ([68.230.241.41] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.4) with ESMTP id 4167213 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:24:36 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.41; envelope-from=rv-4mike@cox.net Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20100316042400.OCTL12229.fed1rmmtao105.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:24:00 -0400 Received: from willsPC ([68.105.86.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id tgQ01d00P1k005Q03gQ0DH; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:24:00 -0400 X-VR-Score: -30.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=9X1BeRvGVdXikaVgI7mHUqmIOlosh/BCISq12UegNM8= c=1 sm=1 a=3_rtSGzJKBsA:10 a=XruvlouZCDbGUgEaRUiNZQ==:17 a=3oc9M9_CAAAA:8 a=HAcrtRYVZRhfUCBLyX8A:9 a=M6iaKiMQbW7-KzqJgigA:7 a=pcmsbYchnWOmnVFmPee8442Uo8kA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=U8Ie8EnqySEA:10 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=ZdH8Pgxe01aUqdvbrOAA:9 a=n3CBsKI4_ovLpifhfN4A:7 a=MN4cXRODfceElZsU46RWKFBxqOsA:4 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=XruvlouZCDbGUgEaRUiNZQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: From: "Mike Wills" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Civil Discourse was : [FlyRotary] Re: Ut-Oh... Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:23:58 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_016E_01CAC485.D3622700" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8089.726 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8089.726 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_016E_01CAC485.D3622700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I chose not to implement the "injector failure switches". I don't know = if there are any statistics on it, but I suspect injector failure is an = extremely rare occurrence. On the other hand if one did fail I'd rather = fly the plane and troubleshoot the problem after I'm on the ground. But = that's part of the advantage in going the Experimental route - build it = the way you want it. Mike Wills=20 From: Bktrub@aol.com=20 Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 8:47 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Civil Discourse was : [FlyRotary] Re: Ut-Oh... In the event of a primary or secondary injector failure, the affected = injector set can be switched off and the cold start switch used to = richen up the remaining injectors. This as per Tracy's instructions. I = haven't tried this, and hope I never have to in the heat of battle, but = there it is.=20 Brian Trubee ------=_NextPart_000_016E_01CAC485.D3622700 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I chose not to implement the = "injector failure=20 switches". I don=92t know if there are any statistics on it, but I = suspect=20 injector failure is an extremely rare occurrence. On the other hand = if one=20 did fail I'd rather fly the plane and troubleshoot the problem after I'm = on the=20 ground. But that=92s part of the advantage in going the = Experimental route -=20 build it the way you want it.
 
Mike Wills 

Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 8:47 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Civil Discourse was : [FlyRotary] = Re:=20 Ut-Oh...

In the event of a primary or secondary injector failure, the = affected=20 injector set can be switched off and the cold start switch used to = richen up the=20 remaining injectors. This as per Tracy's instructions. I haven't tried = this, and=20 hope I never have to in the heat of battle, but there it is.
 
Brian Trubee
 ------=_NextPart_000_016E_01CAC485.D3622700--