X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail-gw0-f52.google.com ([74.125.83.52] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.3) with ESMTP id 4152732 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:01:38 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=74.125.83.52; envelope-from=david.staten@gmail.com Received: by gwb1 with SMTP id 1so1415882gwb.25 for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:01:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+1Mc5ONKKFU5SG8zv/2Gv7MA8BY0Sgv83dTDj1ayFwo=; b=ZYVfSEvDmzeDAGINEXpUwNRKMxpVmew4ZPJIaAx1OcjWX6mYxlKXKY/rBZLYdIO7MD MQHXLFRL1d/qFV2VWbpA2vqAJKc0A3k28H2ZW3qh2dVw7wnP/hg8Fhjnvrq2BBtYfoZV FUjOAj20V7UOHVF66kKdRfRBOgt9Eq2cqy0ag= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Axw0BHIXL53H13VPgeM6NDaOfpIQx10LI89h9uOuBTa1zv9bCB6wbCZ42NPjtW2xS8 xl9GB97MkjDTJUhtouCqH3rjqpwG2VwQ5dJ+pifYj+XKnmfkTLVdlI8LUn6/0p2LxDgW 7WZfkBMSFaoG04r35xYTmAsn4t62HuWbRhvEw= Received: by 10.101.144.32 with SMTP id w32mr586397ann.246.1267750862087; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:01:02 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.103] ([216.80.140.47]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cm31sm1242951ibb.2.2010.03.04.17.01.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:01:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B9057D5.3030400@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:01:09 -0600 From: Dave User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] The stalled propeller blade References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lynn Hanover wrote: > > AOA, I think in terms of the wing producing max lift. The AOA > changes with elevator input. A prop is not unlike a wing, but I still > don’t have a grasp of what is causing AOA change in a fixed pitch > prop. But, usually I have to read things three or four times in order > to “get it”. > Ok.. a "fixed" pitch prop can have a changing AOA.. heres how.. The pitch angle of the plane.. itself... along the crankshaft axis.. has an impact on how the prop sees the oncoming air, and hence varies the angle of attack of the prop blades. An airplane flying at lower airspeeds in its regime will tend to fly nose high.. An airplane flying at higher airspeeds will tend to be nose level or even a tad nose down.. The same prop on the same plane at two different speeds will result in two different pitch angles and therefore two different angle of attacks.. which then have an effect on thrust.