|
|
George Lendich wrote:
Ernest,
I thought it would have more on a concave to the area where you have a convex shape. Certainly Tracy's looks to have 'pinched-in'
areas for top bottom and back, yours seem to be 'bumped-out'.
George ( down under)
I got a PDF of Chapter 12 of the K&W book from somewhere. That chapter has a drawing which lays out the dimensions, which I followed as closely as I could. The test I did of the distribution came out good. I still have to get it off the ground to prove that it is any good, though.
Tracy Crook wrote:
A 'wedge' duct does not preclude a 'bell shaped' duct. The bell shape DOES become distorted to the point of not being recognizable but it still functions as one. I spent several days sculpting mine. Wouldn't have spent that time if a simple wedge would be as good.
Tracy
According to K&W, the distorted wedge comes out looking like this:
http://ernest.isa-geek.org/Delta/Pictures/OilCoolerDuctIntake.jpg
-- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
-- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
|
|