X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.123] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.16) with ESMTP id 3842552 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 07:58:47 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=75.180.132.123; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from computername ([75.191.186.236]) by cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090909115811558.FJHB5638@cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com> for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:58:11 +0000 From: "Ed Anderson" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Boost controller or not: [FlyRotary] Re: Regarding Scott Emer... Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 07:59:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0058_01CA3123.7AADD730" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcoxAs/UgI3W+ghiSduaeP1pBZRM7wAQafcg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Message-Id: <20090909115811558.FJHB5638@cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0058_01CA3123.7AADD730 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sorry bout that, Scott. I misinterpreted Good short field performance as max power take off. But, as I said - so long as you understand the limitations of the no-boost control approach and want the power on the top end, it's certainly possible to do it by correct sizing of the a/r of the turbine housing. Ed Ed Anderson Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC eanderson@carolina.rr.com http://www.andersonee.com http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html http://www.flyrotary.com/ http://members.cox.net/rogersda/rotary/configs.htm#N494BW http://www.rotaryaviation.com/Rotorhead%20Truth.htm _____ From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of SHIPCHIEF@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 12:05 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Boost controller or not: [FlyRotary] Re: Regarding Scott Emer... In a message dated 9/8/2009 2:57:52 PM Pacific Daylight Time, eanderson@carolina.rr.com writes: Ed; I agree with what you posted, however I think you misread what I seek in my plane: I seek good short field performance, and a substantial climb rate. After that I seek a strong cruise for 1 to 2 hours in the 7,000 to 12,000 ft zone followed by rapid decent without regard to shock cooling. I accept the limitations inherent in my design. I will have to limit boost during take off, and hopefully retain about 200 HP at about 12,000 ft. As I said, I'm only looking for a modest power boost at the upper RPM range (where the propeller load is greatest) and to stay within the design limits of the airframe and the reduction gear. Later, I may change anything. For now, this is my attainable goal....I just need to keep working on it until it flies....and beyond. Scott ------=_NextPart_000_0058_01CA3123.7AADD730 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sorry bout that, Scott.  I misinterpreted Good short field performance as max power take off.  = But, as I said - so long as you understand the limitations of the no-boost = control approach and want the power on the top end, it’s certainly = possible to do it by correct sizing of the a/r of the turbine = housing.

 

Ed

 

From: = Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of SHIPCHIEF@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, = September 09, 2009 12:05 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Boost controller or not: [FlyRotary] Re: Regarding Scott = Emer...

 

In a message dated 9/8/2009 2:57:52 PM Pacific = Daylight Time, eanderson@carolina.rr.com writes:
Ed;
I agree with what you posted, however I think you misread what I seek in = my plane:


I seek good = short field performance, and a substantial climb rate. After that I seek a strong = cruise for 1 to 2 hours in the 7,000 to 12,000 ft zone followed by rapid decent without regard to shock cooling.


I accept the limitations inherent in my design. I will = have to limit boost during take off, and hopefully retain about 200 HP at = about 12,000 ft. As I said, I'm only looking for a modest power boost at the = upper RPM range (where the propeller load is greatest) and to stay within the = design limits of the airframe and the reduction gear.
Later, I may change anything. For now, this is my attainable goal....I = just need to keep working on it until it flies....and beyond.
Scott



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of = virus signature database 3267 (20080714) __________

The message = was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
------=_NextPart_000_0058_01CA3123.7AADD730--