X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imr-da03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.145] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.16) with ESMTP id 3842147 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:05:43 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.105.145; envelope-from=SHIPCHIEF@aol.com Received: from imo-da01.mx.aol.com (imo-da01.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.199]) by imr-da03.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n89455au001823 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 00:05:05 -0400 Received: from SHIPCHIEF@aol.com by imo-da01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.5.) id q.c5c.5a092104 (33856) for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 00:04:59 -0400 (EDT) From: SHIPCHIEF@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 00:04:59 EDT Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Boost controller or not: [FlyRotary] Re: Regarding Scott Emer... To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_c5c.5a092104.37d8836b_boundary" X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 10618 X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: SHIPCHIEF@aol.com --part1_c5c.5a092104.37d8836b_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/8/2009 2:57:52 PM Pacific Daylight Time, eanderson@carolina.rr.com writes: Ed; I agree with what you posted, however I think you misread what I seek in my plane: > I seek good short field performance, and a substantial climb rate. After > that I seek a strong cruise for 1 to 2 hours in the 7,000 to 12,000 ft zone > followed by rapid decent without regard to shock cooling. I accept the limitations inherent in my design. I will have to limit boost during take off, and hopefully retain about 200 HP at about 12,000 ft. As I said, I'm only looking for a modest power boost at the upper RPM range (where the propeller load is greatest) and to stay within the design limits of the airframe and the reduction gear. Later, I may change anything. For now, this is my attainable goal....I just need to keep working on it until it flies....and beyond. Scott --part1_c5c.5a092104.37d8836b_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 9/8/2009 2:57= :52 PM Pacific Daylight Time, eanderson@carolina.rr.com writes:
Ed;
I agree with what you posted, however I think you misread what I seek in= my plane:

I seek good sho= rt field performance, and a substantial climb rate. After that I seek a st= rong cruise for 1 to 2 hours in the 7,000 to 12,000 ft zone followed by ra= pid decent without regard to shock cooling.

I accept the limitations inherent in my design. I will have to limi= t boost during take off, and hopefully retain about 200 HP at about 12,000= ft. As I said, I'm only looking for a modest power boost at the upper RPM= range (where the propeller load is greatest) and to stay within the desig= n limits of the airframe and the reduction gear.
Later, I may change anything. For now, this is my attainable goal....I jus= t need to keep working on it until it flies....and beyond.
Scott
 --part1_c5c.5a092104.37d8836b_boundary--