X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from eastrmmtao106.cox.net ([68.230.240.48] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.16) with ESMTP id 3821616 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:21:38 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.240.48; envelope-from=tmann@n200lz.com Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao106.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20090822202102.GWF19495.eastrmmtao106.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:21:02 -0400 Received: from testPC ([98.168.254.7]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id XYM11c00D0ALyG202YM13d; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:21:02 -0400 X-VR-Score: 0.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=7GS2NnrAU-m_yzn5SvIA:9 a=rTLc9trfz2gUl1eBnY6Xq2UsSvEA:4 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=Coidw8ET_hQPS4a4ojsA:9 a=kuZuIDtvHGUD4wkyVQAA:7 a=BrYllCwnUZ1tU3rIaOPWyd2TQ8wA:4 X-CM-Score: 0.00 From: "Thomas Mann" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Three or two? Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:21:02 -0500 Message-ID: <001501ca2366$11dcf490$3596ddb0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016_01CA233C.2906EC90" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcojY+OOBvI0CpW+SYKB1lMgVuYwxgAAXi0w Content-Language: en-us This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01CA233C.2906EC90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable A two rotor engine produce close to 200 hp at 291 LBS (132 KGS) A two rotor with turbo can produce 230 hp at 328 LBS (149 KGS) A three rotor engine can produce 300hp at 390 LBS (177 KGS) =20 =20 From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Gonzalo A. Gim=E9nez Celis Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 3:05 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Three or two? =20 Hi group. As I told in previous questions, I=92m building a Cozy MK IV, = and I like the Rotary idea. I would like to have between 200 and 250 HP, since = in Chile we don=92t have such long runways like in the U.S. and is a pretty mountainous country. Regarding this, which way is better, a three or two rotor engine? Is the three rotor too heavy? Can I use a turbo in a two = rotor engine without affecting reliability and weight? Etc=85 =20 Thanks. =20 Gonzalo Chile ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01CA233C.2906EC90 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

A two rotor engine = produce close to 200 hp at 291 LBS (132 KGS)

A two rotor with = turbo can produce 230 hp at 328 LBS (149 KGS)

A three rotor engine = can produce 300hp at =A0390 LBS (177 KGS)

From:= Rotary = motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of = Gonzalo A. Gim=E9nez Celis
Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 3:05 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Three or two?

Hi group. As I told in previous questions, = I’m building a Cozy MK IV, and I like the Rotary idea. I would like to have = between 200 and 250 HP, since in Chile we don’t have such long runways = like in the U.S. and is a pretty mountainous country. Regarding this, which way = is better, a three or two rotor engine? Is the three rotor too heavy? Can I = use a turbo in a two rotor engine without affecting reliability and weight? Etc…

Thanks.

Gonzalo

Chile

------=_NextPart_000_0016_01CA233C.2906EC90--