X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from poplet2.per.eftel.com ([203.24.100.45] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.15) with ESMTP id 3799631 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 03:43:04 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=203.24.100.45; envelope-from=lendich@aanet.com.au Received: from sv1-1.aanet.com.au (sv1-1.per.aanet.com.au [203.24.100.68]) by poplet2.per.eftel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C2A9173826 for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 15:42:21 +0800 (WST) Received: from ownerf1fc517b8 (203.171.92.134.static.rev.aanet.com.au [203.171.92.134]) by sv1-1.aanet.com.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 62891BEC011 for ; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 15:42:20 +0800 (WST) Message-ID: <6B6DD30A59014235BC121489DE36F47B@ownerf1fc517b8> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: T-shirt design Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 17:42:22 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 090808-0, 08/08/2009), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Ben, That's fine with me, and anyone else that that wants an input.. George (down under) lendich@aanet.com.au Looks pretty good to me, but I am not the only one here. Perhaps others could chime in their thoughts. I think we should move this off list, as it is getting a bit tedious. I will email you direct with further correspondence and then we can maybe show a few different options to the group. Ben --- On Sat, 8/8/09, George Lendich wrote: > From: George Lendich > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: T-shirt design > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Date: Saturday, August 8, 2009, 6:46 PM > > Ben and All, > I don't wish to upset those disinterested in the T-shirt > design, however, something like this will be my final design > for the local lads. > George (down under) > > > All, > > > > Actually, I like both. Now I am torn. I think a > rotor with pilots wings would be pretty cool. Anyone able to > convert the gold wings to a line drawing? I like the idea of > turning the rotor 180* and inserting it between the wings. > But, at the same time, I like the airplane wings on it too. > Dang, I am gonna end up buying several shirts. > > One mentioned putting tail surfaces on the line > drawing, I like that idea, then as mentioned, reverse them > for the canard guys. Would make it more appealing to all I > think. Or the pilots wings would have universal appeal to > canard and conventional guys alike. I don't know... > > > > George, I think you might be right about the thin > lines, may not show up well on shirt, perhaps a line > thickness somewhere in between? > > > > Ben > > > > -- > > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > Archive and UnSub: > > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > -- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html